In the previous sections foundations, LR and, RC there is a date next to each day of studying. I noticed when I got to the practice section that is no longer there. See below. The first being the foundations section and second being the practice section.

I like this feature because it helps me keep an overall sense of time and where I am at in my studying journey.

Is there any feature that shows you how much time you spent on studying so far, and like per/by day, so far I can only see the streak, but I would like a feature where I can see how I am doing and how much time I have spent, just as motivation. Visuals would be nice too, like this but tailored to LSAT/7Sage ofc.

I find tutor responses in the comment sections for specific questions really helpful. It would be great if I had the option to filter to see only those when I got to the comment section.

I think it would be helpful if there were a feature that told us which lesson to review based on our top priorities. For example, let's say next to my top priority question type to review, it would suggest I review a specific lesson.

I am working on an LSAT schedule that will allow me to take my practice tests on Saturdays. However with the current features, it seems that you are not able to individualize the practice blocks yourself. Is there a way to add something similar to this? It would be very helpful!

When I'm on normal color scheme, I see buttons (such as to flag/hide and unhide answers) change colors when clicked. However, on an accessible color scheme the buttons are the same color, making it difficult to see whether I am on answer mode or masking mode.

Could this be implemented?

I have a timing accommodation, and it would be really helpful if the Timing column after a drill or section could be adjusted to reflect timing accommodated testing conditions.

Right now, the target times are based only on standard timing. That means I have to manually calculate what the target time would be under my accommodation in order to gauge whether my pacing was actually on track.

A simple solution could be a dropdown within the Timing section that allows users to select their timing conditions. The default could remain standard time, but users could also choose common accommodation settings like 1.5x or 2.0x time.

The selected setting would then automatically adjust the target time, timing feedback, and over/under calculations for the respective activity.

For students testing with timing accommodations, this would make the timing data much more useful and provide a more accurate picture of pacing without requiring our additional calculations.

So for the CAS GPA calculator I'm suppose to put how many units I have for a certain grade type right? But there is a limit to 100 unit per letter grade...?? Which is a problem for me bc my special snowflake school (UCLA) used a quarter system. Yes I can convert, but I can easily end up with fractions once I do. And I just don't understand why there is a cap at 100 units when there are people who got straights A's in undergrad? Or those who double majored?

This is my breakdown:

A+ = 50.5 quarter units

A = 109.5 quarter units

A- = 15.0 quarter units

So luckily only the A+ doesn't divide cleanly for me, but I still think that it's weird to have a 100 unit cap on the calculator. Like, what if all the A+ I got were A's??? Then I'd have no way to use the calculator. But then again I suck at tech so plz lemme know if I used the tool wrong.

Also: Being able to input units ending in .5 fractions would be helpful.

This has been happening for a while now, which makes writing long and comprehensive comments a bit discouraging. I know I can write them in a notepad and paste them into the comments section, but it would be nice to be able to directly write in the comments.

By the way, I would suggest adding a "Bug" topic so that staff can easily go through all the posts bringing up bugs, which should have more priority over feature requests.

Suggestion for Live Class Question Pool Enhancement

I have noticed that in the live classes, we don't really solve questions from the newer PTs which are more representative of the current test. I think it would be an excellent idea to have live classes where the teachers go over the newer questions as well because I feel like there's a difference between questions from PT150+ vs PTs from like the 100-140 range. The older questions are more cookie cutter, less tricky, and have more obvious patterns whereas the questions from the newest PTs are more convoluted and harder to comprehend so I would love to see live classes where the teachers break down those questions for us as well.

Feel free to let me know if I'm missing something. Out of the many live classes I attended, I don't think I have ever seen the teachers give us a question from PT 150+ which is why I wanted to propose this idea. If the reason for not including those is because y'all don't want people who still haven't solved those PTs to be exposed to them via live classes, I get it. Maybe the class labels can say something like "Disclaimer: this class will contain questions from the newest PTs (150+)." I hope this makes sense!

When I was RSVPing for classes, I saw the save to calendar icon and got excited because it's so much easier to check my calendar than to login to 7Sage to remember what classes I want to take. But it's only Outlook. :(

Would love if this feature could be integrated with Google calendar, too!

When a user crosses out three answer choices during their initial pass, leaving only two options open - their selected answer and one remaining contender - the system automatically flags the question as a Split Decision.

This feature assumes the user has Blind Review set to display only incorrect answers. Within that context, if the user has "Auto Split Decision Switch" enabled in their Blind Review preferences, flagged questions will have their selected answer automatically swapped to the remaining open contender when Blind Review loads. No manual interaction required.

Possible preference toggles:

• Auto-score the swapped answer immediately and evaluate the Blind Review session score

• Hold scoring until the end so the user can work through all other flagged questions before committing

Users who prefer to manually evaluate their split decisions can leave the preference off and encounter the question normally in Blind Review - two answers open, three crossed out.

It would help me because I only use Blind Review to see if the other answer was correct. If there are other answer options open, then I accept that I didn’t evaluate that question as I needed to and need to review it more in-depth later. I still review what was wrong and what was right, but this would eliminate slogging through the section questions and accidentally mis-selecting an intended BR answer - or in the case of a full PrepTest, missing out on swapping the answers from an entire section altogether!

Faster, more accurate question logging begets faster, more accurate question logging begets faster, more accurate question logging begets faster, more accurate question logging....

Can we get the PT equivalent for the blind review in drills too? In the image below, we have the PT equivalent for both the timed results and blind review, but that's only because they were the same.

If the blind review were different, it still only shows the PT equivalent for the timed session.

I think this has been asked for before but I also wanted to request a feature to see how one's priorities tag correction percentage increase or decreases or stays stable over time. That way we can see if the practice we do is beneficial in incresing our success for that tag or if we need additional help with those tags to get those questions correct. It's hard to keep in mind what my previous percentages were and see if I am making any progress in my skills without a feature like this. Thanks!

I am used to throwing a ton of tags in the drill feature to focus on a plethora of problem types I don't like doing. But for some reason, when I put in "Argument Part" and "Phenomenon-Hypothesis" it says there are no questions in my drill set as if I am asking for it to choose questions where both tags apply at the same time. Is there a way to make it so they apply separately?

In my opinion newer LSATs are getting more and more... "creative" with argument part questions, so I certainly want to work on them even though a lot of them are super easy.

I've been struggling a lot with MP RC questions lately. Been working on trying new strategies to get better, but it would be helpful if I could drill old passages and only answer the MP question - that way I could stack a ton back to back and test my new methods without getting bogged down by other questions. It got me thinking it would be helpful to customize RC drills so I could choose to only have one question type show up, so I could focus on refining that specific skill - even if that meant only answering one question after a passage.

It would even just be helpful to filter passages that have certain question types.

Thank you! Wishing everyone the best of luck in the home stretch.

I keep losing my notes when I type in the notes tab. Sometimes it's my own fault, where I accidentally cut a piece of text or accidentally paste onto a piece of text. Other times, like just now, I write a wall of text only to have it disappear due to a weird glitch. No biggie if I can just Ctrl-Z to undo the disappearance, but the text fields here don't allow undos.

This is maybe more of a question, but I noticed for the section of my study plan in the month of June, most of the RC lessons are marked as done. I definitely did these in the main curriculum, but a few days ago it appeared as 0% complete, so I assumed there would be lessons to work on there. Is this a bug from current development or did it just finally load that I did many of the lessons already?

Hi all,

Quick question. On the real August 2026 LSAT and beyond, will there be no more highlighting in the passage to specific parts of the question? As you can see below, this is what's been normal, and it seems like its no longer available on the new LawHub interface.

I hope you can see what I mean. If this feature will be on the real test, is it possible to add to 7Sage? It honestly is really helpful, especially for questions that ask what a certain word means when used in a specific context.

After doing a test section or adaptive questions in the lesson plans I often do my own math to see what my average time per question was, my overall time gained/lost was, etc. Would be cool to have these built in.

Would it be possible to toggle off the info about why a question was included for blind review? I know it doesn't show the reason unless you hover over the (i) icon, but I often lack the self restraint not to look and then change my answer if the question was included in BR when I got it wrong whereas I otherwise might not have changed my AC. It would be great if I could make it so it's not even an option for me to see why the question was included in BR until after I've completed BR. Thanks!

When my internet cuts out momentarily and is working to reconnect, the timer continues to count down despite the rest of the page being unusable (so I can't pause the timer manually). Is possible to program the timer to pause automatically when there are connection issues that interfere with the rest of the page?

Thank you for all your hard work!!

The lessons in the study plan should be adaptive based on frequently missed topics for each user based on that user's diagnostic, if the user chose to take a diagnostic. If this is already implemented maybe I missed it? It would also be nice to be able to pick additional lessons from the "lessons" tab that we want to add to the study plan on our own (for example, I want to add the admissions and LSAT writing modules in to my study plan)

Would it be possible to make adaptive drilling available in the new LSAT interface format?

A way to track how many hours spend studying and reviewing.