I want to clearly be able to see the question types where I'm choosing the "trap" answer (e.g. the answer choice which other test takers most frequently choose). There is no easy way to see this in the 7sage interface, nor can I download my wrong answer choices and associated percentage wrong and question type in a table format to use AI to analyse it for me. Can you please help fix this? Seems like a key feature students should have access to.

Maybe this is already a thing but when I’m reviewing a specific tag (ex parallel reasoning) I would love to be able to click the arrow and it takes me to the next question within the tag (parallel reasoning questions) instead of taking to the next question in the section. I know I could just run a drill with the tag but sometimes I just want to consecutively watch the videos or read the explainers for that tag without having to go back and forth from the missed questions page to the question I’m reviewing.

I recently discovered that now we can filter by Answer choice tags in Analytics > Questions. Could we get the same feature under Drills as well? Would be useful to know which type answer choice I keep gravitating towards every time I pick the wrong answer.

I have been at this for a while, so I have gone through a lot of the material and don't have much left in the 'fresh' pile. It would be great if there was a tag that shows how many times you have taken a question or test and the date. It is there when I scroll through the analytics but it has become time consuming to go through this each time and create a custom drill for myself.

With the June LSAT less than a month away, I would really like to be able to see my improvement by tag. I want to see if what I've been doing to target issues within specific tags as been working...

Hi, I would love to have the highlighting text feature in a lesson text. If I bookmark a chapter review, I would love to go over and scan the main points next time instead of reading the whole chapter again. Maybe that feature already exists, and I missed it?

It would be great if we could select wrong questions (some or all of them) to review in tester mode, that way we can approach the problem in clean mode and compare to prior attempts.

Also it would be great if the wrong questions in analytics can be sort by oldest to earliest.

Thanks!

Sorry if this is already a feature I'm missing, but if not, it would be great to do the lessons just on what you struggle with (based on the prep test analytics). I find that I spend a lot of time doing lessons on things that I don't struggle with, and I would love to be able to just see which lessons would be recommended for me.

Hi! I have 1.5x time. Is that reflected in my timing statistics and targets in analytics?

First of all thank you so much for adding the new LawHub interface!!

I understand it is in Beta but a pause button is going to be added soon right?

I think it would be nice to be able to do blind review on question by question drills.

In the settings of custom drills you select "review after each question" instead of "at the end".

But if you get something wrong it explains it right after.

The drill would be cooler to get a second crack at it BR style before the actual answer is revealed and explained. I think you would enrich your learning experience with this feature.

I've been using 7Sage for about 5 months now and I have really enjoyed the curriculum. Now that I've gotten to the study block phase, I noticed the block allows you to select how long you'd like to study a day. My issue with this is that it only accounts for 2 hours worth of drilling and does not include time for blind review/wrong answer journaling.

For me, blind review/journaling can take up to 30 minutes per section (which is a long time, I just prefer to be thorough). With this in mind, I wanted to suggest that the study blocks include at least 30 minutes of wrong answer journaling into the study day. This would make the study day more realistic to actual practice. If I only have two hours to study, chances are I can complete 1 RC section + review and MAYBE a few targeted drills with review (while I'm in the early stages of studying at least).

Is it possible you could pin the tutor/instruction responses to student questions to the top of the comments in the explanation discussions? Or have a drop down selection for 7sage responses. Then we wouldn't have to scroll thru all the comments to see if there is one. Thanks!

I would love to see like an AI generated explanation of how I did with the previous study block and why it generated the next study block that way, so that I can know more specifically what I need to work on and am aware of it...

Would it be possible to have the practices in the study plan be actually representative of the target time?

For example, I just did a paragraph that had a target time of a little bit over 10 minutes, however the study plan suggested 8:45 (which seems to be the default). I would not know the target time of the paragraph and cannot pace myself accordingly, definitely could have used that extra minute and a bit.

If the practice was able to look at what the target time is and suggest that as default, I could practice in a more realistic scenario. In the case where there are 2 or more paragraphs in a section of the study plan, it would be useful if it can add their target time instead of stay at 8:45 default per paragraph.

Hey, it would be nice to have an option to do drills on passages without questions. I know we can review passages on the explanation tab and practice there. But it would be beneficial to have the highlighting tool and the timer for practice. Plus, having this available won't ruin my analytics if I decide to skip the questions to see the passage analysis. Thank you

It would be amazing if the questions could link to live class sections where that question was covered so we can see it in action and almost check to see if our thought process/approach was right.

I've been using the Adaptive Drills a lot, but I was wondering if there could be another drilling feature to mimic the question difficulty order to match the real LSAT.

For example, on the current Adaptive drills, within a 10 Q set, a 5 star could be in the middle and the last 3 questions could be 1-2 stars. What if this other drilling feature could generate within a 10Q set 1-2 stars towards the beginning, mix of 3-5 stars from middle to the end, or a sequence that mimics the real LSAT?

Also, would it be possible to have a timer setting where on top of the current timing conditions (standard, 150%, 200%), you could choose to continue the clock, even if you run out of time? Let's say that you have a drill of 10Q that you want to do in 100%. You would click this additional time button on the drill generate page. When you are doing the drill, everything is the same until you finish the 100% timer. Once you hit 0:00, the clock starts counting back in red or another color and you have time to do finish the drill but in over time. Once you finish the drill and BR, you can see the timing you got in the 100% time and the extended time.

My reason for suggesting the timing feature is that sometimes I do a drill and don't get to finish the drill. I just run out of time. So, I see the question for the first time in BR, which means I don't really get to BR those missed questions. It would be great if you could have equal chances to BR on questions you answered and questions you missed in the selected timing.

Thanks 7sage Team!!

I am in the process of going through the LSAT Writing Lessons in anticipation of completing the argumentative writing portion of the test.

However, I noticed that the introductory article "LSAT Argumentative Writing and How to Prepare" is outdated and repeatedly references an important update coming "August 2024," as well as numerous other outdated claims and predictions. Please update the article to reflect the writing portion as it exists in the 2026-27 cycle; reading it I worry that I am being misled by outdated facts and predictions.

Would love to see more flexibility with the timer settings.

I receive double time accommodations, and right now it caps out at 200% or you have to go all the way to unlimited time. There are definitely situations where I’d want a little more time while still keeping some pressure. Something like 225% or 250% would be really useful.

Unlimited time doesn’t really solve it because then I can sit on one question forever, which isn’t how the actual test feels.

Also, the average test taker can already give themselves extra time in practice pretty easily. It would be great to have that same flexibility on the accommodations side instead of being locked into preset limits.

Honestly, even just the ability to manually set the clock would fix this. Being able to choose your own section time would create that missing middle ground.

Can we get dark mode for the app please

Is it possible to have a green progress bar showing under our priorities by question type in analytics how much we improved by after a drill? So if on CondR my accuracy was 80% and I take a perfect drill, the gains in accuracy % would be in green? This would be so cool of you alllllllllllll

Would it be possible to block certain questions in drills that you have gone over in class/quizzes? There are some questions that I have seen enough that I immediately know the answer and reason. I have turned off full sections because I know some of the questions well enough that I feel like it is skewing my stats to have them pop up again and get them right in 5 seconds but I could still use reviewing other questions in those sections. It would be nice to just mute/block certain well used questions from classes and curriculum.

I have been wanting to export my drilling/PT data so that I can look at more specific trends than the 7sage platform allows me to... I want to see my progress on specific tags and feed my data into AI so I can do more targeted and specific studying vs just specific drill types.

Hi. Especially for folks drilling harder questions and passages, it would be SO helpful if the time allocated for a drill matched the TOTAL TARGET TIME (the sum of all the individual question or passage target times). Right now I think it matches the average time one should spend per passage or question times the number of passages or questions. This is not helpful when I am drilling level 4 and five passages (for example see below), which should take me 9+ minutes each, and the drill cuts off at 17:30. Please help!