108 posts in the last 30 days

User Avatar

Last comment tuesday, mar 22 2022

PT7.S1.Q8 (MSS)

Hey, so I recently did this MSS question and I struggled to understand why A is the answer, could anyone help pls? I picked B cause I really didn't know what else to choose. I didn't like A cause it said a "comprehensive approach" but how do we know that a comprehensive approach could shrink the health care costs?

Thank you :)

Hey 7Sagers,

Here's the official March 2022 LSAT Discussion Thread.

REMINDER: Under your Candidate Agreement, you may not discuss the details of any specific LSAT questions at any time. For the March LSAT, general discussion of what sections you had, or how difficult you found a given section, or speculation about which sections were scored or unscored, is prohibited until after 9pm ET, Tuesday, March 15th.

Posts that violate these rules will be taken down and may result in disciplinary action from LSAC. Let’s work together to ensure the test is fair to everyone, and not share information before everyone has taken the test.

Some examples of typical comments:

The following comments are okay 🙆‍♀️

  • the section on Cambodian woodworking really had me second guessing everything.
  • a few of the games had me confused but think I was okay.
  • overall fair test, struggled on a couple of RC passages (damn you polymorphic molecules) but think I was okay hoping for a -2 or -3
  • The following comments are over the line 🙅‍♂️

  • the passage on Cambodian woodworking didn’t count.
  • I had Cambodian woodworking, Fireflies, and rice farming in Iowa so Lithuanian Lithograph Libraries was experimental.
  • fair test but struggled on a couple RC passages (polymorphic molecules anyone? Thankfully it didn’t count). Don’t want to take again in March
  • Anyone know if Polygamist Societies in the 1880s was real or experimental?
  • Please tell me that polygon dice game didn’t count
  • Good luck to everyone taking the March LSAT!

    **Please keep all discussions of the March 2022 LSAT here!**(/red)

    In the MSS question sets, I found two interesting question stems. Even though they’re both categorized broadly as MSS questions, I found some nuances for each of them that might be helpful for shaving off time. If you find a flaw in my reasoning, please point it out!

    Here are the two question stems and my comments for each:

    “The statements above, if true, serve LEAST well as evidence for which one of the following?

    - Correct answer not supported; every other answer at least a little bit supported

    - In the videos, JY compares this to an MSS except question, where the incorrect answer choices each have a ton of

    support

    “Which one of the following is LEAST compatible with the information given in the stimulus?

    - Correct answer not supported (contradicts, even); every other answer compatible, but not necessarily supported (Why?

    Because they could be irrelevant and still be compatible)

    SO, why does this matter?

    - In a “serve LEAST well as evidence” question, each one of the incorrect answer choices must be relevant to the stimulus

    in some way. If it’s not relevant, then you know it’s the right answer choice.

    - In a “LEAST compatible” question, an incorrect answer choice does not have to be relevant to the passage. Don’t just

    choose it because it’s irrelevant.

    For examples of each q-stem, see: lsat 25.s2.q19 & lsat 35.s4.q22

    03/18/2022: Hello everyone? I need to learn which is the correct contrapositive (3) below.

    Could anyone help?

    A park contains at most five of seven kinds of trees--firs, laurels, maples, oaks, pines, spruces, and yews --

    Admin Note: deleted the question because it is against our Forum Rules to post full LSAT questions on the Forum.

    Analysis:

    Steps 1-4

    F L M O P S Y (max 5)

    If M, not Y

    If Y, not M

    If F, not P

    If P, not F

    If not Y, (Exactly one of L / O)

    If L and O, Y (my question, it is supposed to be not Y isn't it)

    If not L and not O, Y

    If not L or not O, F and S

    If not F or not S, L and O

    Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-b-section-2-game-2/

    How is E correct? It appears to be supporting the conclusion not weakening it. My understanding of the argument's Conclusion is that it's telling environmentalists to relax because nature is going to adjust itself to the rising levels of the atmosphere.

    E (if I'm understanding correctly) states that the Earth's natural adjustment process, which happens over the course of a million years, allows for the atmosphere to successfully cope with large short term variances in the carbon level.

    How is this weakening? I leaned toward C initially because if carbon was just one piece of the atmospheric "blanket", then nature fixing just carbon wouldn't be enough to prevent the environment from getting dangerously hot.

    User Avatar

    Last comment thursday, mar 17 2022

    Weaken Questions

    I am struggling so hard in these. Does anyone have any pointers?? I feel like I'm so close sometimes, then during BR I change my right answer to the wrong one! Or, of course I just get it wrong 100% and am totally lost. HELP :(

    Hi! I’ve recently started my LSAT journey and I’m working through the LG section of 7Sage. However, I’m still missing -2 to -3 on a lot of games and I’m just not sure how to improve (besides continuing to work through practice games of course). Everyone says it’s the easiest section to learn, but I’m really struggling and I don’t know many people who have taken or are taking the LSAT and actually did well on LG. If anyone consistently gets -0 to -1 I would love to chat and hear any advice or tips and strategies that work for you!

    x

    User Avatar

    Last comment wednesday, mar 09 2022

    146 to 157!

    So I am sure that a 157 isn't very impressive to many. I started studying for the LSAT during December 2021 after I accepted I would take a year off before applying to law school after graduation and then realized I didn't want to do that. I took my first LSAT in January 2022 and was so stressed out that I fully jinxed myself. I got a 146 and knew I couldn't apply anywhere with that. I signed up for the February LSAT as backup in January so decided to try again. I studied for 12 days and took the February LSAT but was way calmer this time. I got my score back last week and it was a 157! I full 11 point jump in 1 month! I'm sure it's lower than most people's standards but this got me into my ideal school's score range so I'm happy!!

    Hi all,

    Recently I went through 10 passages (old & recent) and totaled up all my missed questions.

    My top two missed were InfAP and Inf OP overwhelmingly. Does anyone have guidance or tips for improving on these question types?

    (For reference if needed, my third most missed was tied between InfAA, UAO, RecMP (lol) and RecS).

    Thanks!

    If you have done this passage and got Q14 right, would you mind explaining your thought process? The passage says "the second rationale is that a punishment is justified by severity of a crime." This leads me to interpret that the consequence (severity) of the crime matters to punishment. So I was looking at C and E. Can someone who has figured out this question explain where I went wrong? Thank you!

    Can anyone explain why natural cause in (B) excludes only meteorite but not volcanic events?

    Why isn't volcanic activity a natural cause...?

    I got every detail right, but eliminated (B) right away since I thought natural cause refers to both meteorite and volcanic events.

    Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-23/

    Hello! I would really appreciate any strategies to improve at LR. When I do the question types individually I do good on them, but when I do a full LR section I cannot seem to improve. Any strategies, tips, or studying patterns that anyone has to offer, please please tell me.

    I BR and I go over my wrong answers and see where I made the mistakes. But that has not done a whole lot for me.

    User Avatar

    Last comment friday, mar 04 2022

    Logic game studying tips

    Hello guys,

    I have been doing some drill sets for logical games and I have been taking my time to work through them. Sometimes I do 100% more time and I do really well. I was wondering if you guys recommend taking your time or timing yourself to see how well you can do. I feel like I take way too long and am wondering when I should progress to the timed ones.

    #help

    For example, for PT5 S2 Q17, JY solves the question by referencing from his past game boards from past questions to eliminate a majority of the ACs.

    Does everyone "save" their game boards like JY does? If so, how do you go about drawing each of them out under limited time? Do you just scribble relevant figures in similar positions without making a full board?

    So far, I have been making master game boards using pen and erasing memos written in pencil before moving onto the next question.

    I'm curious because I feel like using JY's technique might be a game changer for me. Thank you.

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?