#feedback need 7sage offline so I can use it on a plane ✈️

Is this both critique-debate and problem-analysis?

Reading the section - it's very difficult to tell what is part of the passage, and what is usage commentary

what is the shortcut to make superscripts and subscripts (exponent)

"But Weiner's opponents contend that his views betray a certain nostalgia for the idea of the 'noble savage.' "

The explanation says Weiner's view reflects noble-savage nostalgia. The text says his views betray noble-savage nostalgia.

What is the meaning here?

"The camera is not so at odds with Kayapo culture, it seems, that it transforms any Kayapo who uses it into a Westerner."

Isn't the bolded portion Weiner's whole argument? This conclusion threw me off

I chose E in attempts to deny the assumption of the geologists "earliest known traces of multicellular animal life."

What if worms existed 500 million years earlier than other multicellular animals? It sounds like E gives an explanation for why worms could have existed for example, 600+ million years prior, because "evidence of their earliest existence is scarce" (due to soft tissue).

Doesn't this weaken the conclusion that claims worms could not have left the tracks?

Where can I find more on error correction mechanism?

#feedback