- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
"This seemingly-obvious concept is commonly exploited on the LSAT." Therefore, LSAT authors are exploiting us poor baby lawyers in training. Thus, LSAT authors exploit babies.
@AliaAli adjusts pretty girl lawyer suit sorry u had to see that everybody... high heels clicks as i walk away dramatically from this question
why cant the real lsat have br, so if u frick it up the first time u have a second shot. IM PRETTY SURE MEDIEVAL GLASS ISNT GOING TO DETERMINE WHETHER IM A GOOD LAWYER OR NOT
i will become a lawyer, i will become a lawyer, i will become a lawyer, a stupid passage about medieval glass won't change that... sniffles
@AliaAli he even found a Brazilian dude to corroborate his anger for ppl who say it flows downwards XD
lol this feels like an angry tangent from the author as to why glass doesn't flow downwards
if people were made of germanium oxide glass, it would take many trillions of years for us to sag noticeably, got it. Then we can keep our thickness 😁
Think of it like, the LSAT authors don't want to see you succeed, they want to gatekeep you from the legal circle. Use that as motivation to keep going and prove them wrong :P
I'll just leave this here: "Thicker bottoms is not because glass flows downward" :P


these critics are beefing with Mphalele. This doesn't just feel like artistic criticism lol