- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I know a lot of people personally and on this platform that believe jumping up a lot in score is out of reach. I got a 159 in June of 2025 and today I got my August score back and saw a 176. To literally anyone and everyone that needs to hear this, let me serve as proof that you CAN make that jump. There is no barrier that hard work can’t break down. Keep at it and don’t give up on yourself, even for a second. Anyone who wants to follow up with me regarding studying tips or even mental advice for tests feel free. I believe in all of you.
@ChristopherTobin Something I think it's important to note regarding assumptions for D is that even if they were vulnerable, that doesnt mean its possible that they didn't need internal records or anything. Embezzlement is inherently an internal crime and the stim establishes it as a necessary condition. Only B directly weakens by saying someone else got access to them. D says that the corporation was vulnerable to INTERNAL crimes. Hope that helps that's just how I understood it. Another additional thing with these questions where 2 answer choices seem right, I would say just focus on the argument. At the very least, C makes a point about accountants and actuaries, whereas D doesn't at all. Think about how D cannot in anyway lead you to believe that it was more likely to be one or the other in terms of who committed the crime.
@Shannell_E'llan Basically, what it's saying is that the 52% of people who thought he was good never changed their opinion. Its the same people before and after the ethics violation accusation. That is because, as A points out, pretty much every person who DOES believe he is guilty ALREADY thought he was bad. So the 52% of people who thought he was good before and after were unaffected.