- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
Diagrammed this right and everything, just did not connect that the second sentence was totally irrelevant to answering the question
Felt like this explanation kind of glanced over the right answer and did not dig that much deeper into the assumptions and why B is incorrect.
I am really struggling with conditional reasoning and diagramming. I have reviewed the core curriculum and foundations extensively, but it just has not seemed to click for me. I am not sure what I am doing wrong here, trying to see if anyone has found themselves in a situation before and what helped you get out of this and get better at conditional reasoning/making diagrams.
This section was absolutely nasty. One of the most difficult sections I have ever encountered practicing
I tend to do well on RC Passages but frequently go over time, whether that's with reading or answering questions. Any tips out there from those that struggled with timing but eventually managed to find solutions to knock out this section(s) of the exam?
@BradyBrook Physically writing will waste time. It is best to think about this in your head
Should we be making our own low-res summaries as we do this or just be watching the videos? I am making my own but of course Kevin's explanations are much better so trying to figure out what is best from a learning perspective
After I have published a note, I cannot seem to edit it anymore. Anyone else having this issue. Clicking "Edit Note" does nothing for me.
ugh I knew this was A but was thrown off by the "next year' statement so I picked C. Kicking myself
Anyone have a handy cheat sheet/master list for the quantifiers ("some," most," "all," "few," etc), what they imply, their negations, and valid and invalid arguments that can be made with them (I.e All before most is invalid)?? Having all this out on one page would be super helpful for me so just thought I'd ask.
I have to repeat how great that last lesson was. It really helped on this question.
Do people just intuitively know these assumptions he is making? I am really having trouble getting to those assumptions he gets to.
Going through the core curriculum, I am understanding that a huge part of WSE questions is understanding and recognizing assumptions the authors make in the stimulus. But I am having immense difficulty trying to do so. Anyone have any tips for getting better at this?
Challenging question. Got it incorrect but very useful to know why