@icebearonly im on the second

Would made me choose E was that the facts that the author provided in my opinion would wreck that hypothesis so yes while I did notice the terms such as doubt and not supported well or whatever the evidence for his case were just to damn good idk man.

all these terms fucked me looked like tangled wires smh

a nice prediction of the main point would've helped a lot D just felt like something I didnt read so I just went with it do to timing but def understand ayayay

man for some reason I had thought that the conclusion was rejecting the first sentence. What I read was that this is what these bank companies do but since they cant predict it they arnt curbing inflation.

I read the question too fast and I thought I had to weaken the claim that these birds follow the cattle for the insects. ayayay

@vch26263 I think A would make the columnist argument trash but the assumption is that he thinks it isnt a big deal so therefore lets not waist money on moving the power lines.

@danbiddulph4562 Just ask yourself why would they want to rule this out? Well if they could they would have already which is the NA.

@benpalook yeah that's exactly what I assumed I thought there had to be a least percentage of change in the data or something so didnt put it together unfortunately.

so not being persuaded does not mean grams conclusion is wrong. I guess it is just to soft

before even reading the question I was like o yea this is a parallel question so I made sure I dialed in on the argument and told myself o its a lose lose situation and when I went to the answers I looked for a lose lose answer choice.

Took me a min to understand the premises I was mad confused but thankfully the conclusion was straight forward so then I told myself ok find answer that proves that this data is misleading. B is saying that the data was done in the lab and im like brother that's not good data then because in real life conditions the soil conditions would vary.

I got this wrong and I think there was no way I would have been able to predict this on my first try but from what I understand is that the columnist is assuming that T is like the final piece of the puzzle that determines if P is guilty or not. The problem is that first we dont know what she said inside the court room so how can we say that the some of the jury didnt believe her statement. Maybe her statement in the trial was about the weather. Like that wouldn't be like a major indicator that P is guilty. I guess what I am saying is that the info inside of the court room could've been a minor piece of the puzzle which could have not led the jury to say that P is guilty or not guilty.

Personal correspondence is kinda crazy like I felt like it was just to strong to say that because what if its his phone, gun, computer etc. Passage never says that it only says thoughts to oneself.

@Katrinalemieuxx I stopped mapping such a big waste of time tbh I just started to do mental predictions and the more I did that during drills the better I got. Honestly Just find the flaw and that same feeling you got on the stimulus try and find in the answer choices. Like when I read the stimulus right away I told myself well something else could've made it go down since it's sufficient.

contra positive would've helped me here but I completely forgot that the stimulus was saying "could not exist" and the answer says the opposite or contrastive. My ass picked C because I was like the if then was perfect and A wasn't but didnt realize it.

@wcameron16376 I just read similarly and said ok need to find something negative about relying on info from the average JOE

@aphroc975 in between the commas is a premise

On B reading hand signal felt like it was being learned and moved passed it but reading it slowly its clearly not learned if each signal makes dolphins do new tricks than the trainers aren't instructing the dolphins to do specifically.

The last paragraph really wrecked me when answering question 1. I think this is what happened so since in the last paragraph the author was going back and forth with the similarities and differences I think I was so caught up with the differences that I assumed the author was trying to say that the Chinese american dialect was in fact a unique dialect but man that last sentence proved me wrong. It is just difficult for me to hold all that information in my head without writing it down.

@BbbaseddD !!!!!!

@OverheadHopefulStructure yesh

was over here thinking that they wanted to help others bit neglected Rhonda saying "as long as the cost is not great" and Brad saying "return" ayayay been having the problem of getting ahead causing me to skim and not truly grasp the stimulus

initially I had thought supply meant like more wood lol I was like what the fahhhhh

these supported questions take me forever to do ! but got it correct just need to not second guess myself