i feel like this is not a 5/5 difficulty question??

@vanordquist5 Your comment is 2 years old and, presumably, you're past the LSAT and in law school now, but this has me cackling.

@BenjaminMcDaniel Happy it worked for you but in the future be aware that LSAT questions can and do propose objectively false information and ask you to take it as true.

I only fell for the trap because I misread (or mis-skimmed) the key word infancy. I was falsely under the impression that the hypothesis was referring to germ exposure in the womb; which means daycare wouldn't matter. Whoops

@jackmiller i believe since this is just a review of the section, they are the same questions for everyone. but when you're in the drilling section of the site it will suggest question types you need to work on.

@EricaThorniley But E didn't claim Wally's IS a large nursery it just poses "IF wally's is a large nursery then X" and that X statement is strongly supported by the stim.

This lesson made me incredibly unhappy. I couldn't even finish the video.

@SlippinJimmy2026 Yes! Looking back, it is really that simple.

@JuliaSchroeder Connecting words are a good indicator that an argument is being made but the content surrounding the connections needs to be relative. I could say, "My cat hasn't eaten lately. This means she's old." Which contains both a premise and a conclusion but that premise doesn't support that conclusion.