- Joined
- Feb 2026
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
But you cannot rule out other causes for the ever increasing Ozone hole in A. That's why I chose C, because it at least it shows chlorine would react in a uniquely violent way
The explanation says that C is the "wrong flaw", but isn't C still logically valid? #Help
Holy... only 17% get this right... with 180 warriors having only a 50% chance.
I wish there was a way to see all the similarly difficult questions in one bank.
Can this question not be deconstructed using conditionality only? That;s how I got to E. Surprised to see 7Sage didn't use it
My issue is equating "guarantee a steady flow of customers" with "only when it is necessary to do so in order to attract customers" in AC D.
Even though we know that Traintrack Inn is nearly guaranteed a steady flow of customers, how can we reasonably assume that it is not still necessary for Traintrack to attract even more customers (or failing the necessary condition)?
In other words, who are we to say what is and isn't necessary for Traintack, or what it wants?
This question has me eating a bag of complimentary Texas Roadhouse peanuts before my LSAT tomorrow...
And I DON'T EVEN LIKE PEANUTS!
Curse you, LSAT writers, and your subliminal temptations, which apparently don't only include trap answers.
The issue I have with B is how can we reasonably assume that cows and sheep are such "animals raised on grain" mentioned in the stimulus?
In the explanation of AC A, it says
"Contrapositive: an increase in visitors is necessary (as well as sufficient) to increase revenues."
Is the as well as sufficient part referring to the argument's use of the number of visitors increasing as sufficient to ensure an increase in tax revenue?
If not, I don't understand how AC A is using this as both necessary and sufficient.
HOW is this part of A not Circular Reasoning:
Greeting one's coworkers must be a polite thing to do, because people who are considered polite always greet their coworkers.
I take this as: G->P, and then P->G, which is what the question stimulus does.
What am I missing here?
@JohnCarey yeah, but it goes from a poll about belief in the Mayor being guilty of ethics violations to a poll about good performance; I struggle taking these as the same poll, since the first is a "yes or no" answer, and the other is a "bad, not good, good, great one". I think there's too many assumptions required to make this the same poll.
What say you, Kevin Lin?
@B_Freeze2631 I get all that, but I'm still stuck on how it is an unreasonable assumption that Pat IS a member of the club.
@sfbunting1731 sounds like I wrote this comment myself! I wonder if LSAC would ever consider reviewing this question and removing it from the scoring matrix because of this exact issue. I could not find a right answer because of it.
The overwhelming majority of the mass in the universe is composed of something else, no galaxies.
These spelling mistakes are becoming too common not to be confusing.
@jakekane But isn't actually Goal -> Government polices? The Gov. policy is the necessary condition here. That is what still trips me up about AC A: folks pressuring the gov. into action only fulfills the necessary condition of producing change.
#help #admin @admin @MichaelWright