Why does it matter if the cars are still running or not? they're disposing of them anyways, so to say its important to note if they run or not isnt actually as important as it claims

Would national not mean possibly overseas?

I picked A because it supports the conclusion that the critic had about ruling out a copyist. I'm confused on how thats not more right

You dont need an explanation for why plankton are disapearing. its already true, so it doesnt matter how or why its happening, you take it as fact

How are we to know that they have other means of increasing meat yields if their original way is gone? Stimulus implies nothing about alternatives

why not B? it adds both a and the fact they scheduled for next year, so its a more strong answer

AC E explanation doesnt make sense. "The speaker does not say that socially responsible businesses will last forever". The AC doesnt say it will, it just says that some businesses have lost the power even when adapting the ways of LoR. So explain that

"we arent comparing the productivity" WE LITERALLY ARE. if you take 2 groups and see who came out on top from a new variable introduced, THATS TEXTBOOK COMPARISON

Paul doesnt call into question, he just points out that Sarah fails to assume the upside of the policy.

the study doesnt assume that different studies will ALWAYS have different results. it doesnt even assume that it can

This is such a coinflip question. You annot get this right unless youre lucky. Also, how do we know that there cant be something faculty and students like together?

"author fails to consider more than one factor" they dont??? they mention both failure to obey and inadequate equipment, not seperately. bffr

This question actually makes no sense

Is it not part of the conclusion? 7sage says whatever is usually after however is the conclusion. Are we being misled then?

wtf, this isnt a PhenLR question, this is a conditional question.

AC C doesnt weaken. It just explains what theyre doing by correcting the errors. just because it follows up doesnt mean its not avoiding mistakes

I knew C was right but picked D anyways. I felt since the conclusion was very specific and closed off, that the answer must be that way too. C makes more sense but it also kinda is vague and weird

I picked C because the citizen throughs around "they" which is very vague, and thus, could mean that they are overlooking who the judge made the judgement for in this

@GDatria715 How does radius connect at all with the fact it was a mistake? that just makes more issues, and youd have to dig more for a link.

AC A makes sense if you allow for vague, bs answers. just because it could be made within the same 5 mile radius doesnt stregthen the conclusion tht talks about its origin

"The author does not assume there are no other ways to relieve overcrowding on Earth." but he doesnt say there is either. How are we not certain that this is a false dichotomy flaw? Wouldnt popluating the moon be pretty drastic too?

why should we care about the body when the heart is the only mentioned body part in the stimulus? how many times have we been criticized by the 7sage people for picking these answeers that involve "irrelevant information"?

No way this was 1 star difficulty

if anything, E is a flawed link assumption. Just because color is harder to pass doesnt make natural pesticides easier. for all we know, the pesticides are harder for whatever reason, the answer also says "for ALMOST any other trait to be passed" that almost could leave out the pesticides

This all makes sense when you dont think of it linear. The diet itself was not the factor that made people have poor health, its the condition in which they suffer from that causes poor health.