- Joined
- Apr 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
it starts to come together when you take the time to seperate sentences and then understand the concepts
WHAT? how are we supposed to know this? let alone make this bold, unfounded assumption? I cant stand ts
A negated destroys the argument, and yet its still wrong? I'm sorry, didnt the negation tactic become the gold standard, and now its wrong? wtf are we doing?
me laughing because people are getting rightfully upset at the stupid hurdles we have to jump to make "correct" assumptions
by far the worst section. the conclusions arent making sense and some of these are outright nonsense
getting them wrong first time but getting BR right. Ngl just been guessing so lets hope bs like this isnt on the LSAT much
i got this quick only because I've seen it before. Lowkey only makes sense if you just dumb down the language
im starting to regress. We already established we cant send a space craft, so why is the answer that we can? hopefully this suff wont be as prominent on the test
respectfully, this made no sense. Hopefully I dont encounter it on the LSAT but be fr, this is bs
i dont want to mislead, but these types of questions just feel like summing up the argument. Thats my approach and its been working fairly well
@mutayeb considering the fact you keep responding with negativity, it shows you wont do well on the character fitness portion. keep calm and take the down vote
@mutayeb bro who do you think you are? this is the LSAT, stop trying to be a keyboard warrior
damn. I know for a fact theres gonna be subjective answers, but we gotta pick the one the writers chose
doesnt really make sense. why are we talking about individual properties when it clearly states all members are selfish?
since when does "yet" intend for a conclusion?