- Joined
- Apr 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
if anything, E is a flawed link assumption. Just because color is harder to pass doesnt make natural pesticides easier. for all we know, the pesticides are harder for whatever reason, the answer also says "for ALMOST any other trait to be passed" that almost could leave out the pesticides
This all makes sense when you dont think of it linear. The diet itself was not the factor that made people have poor health, its the condition in which they suffer from that causes poor health.
i mean, yeah, in a world where we can pull stuff out of our ass, ig D makes sense. ITs an alternative explanation, but thats what C does though
makes no sense. i know i need to be open minded but the stimulus says nothing about food
guys i got a 143. how cooked am i if i wanna shoot for a 160+ for october?
I think I see why the answer was the way it was, however, AC D doesnt delve at all on the nutrition, variety or number of courses
E explanation is: "This points out a benefit of fruits and vegetables that vitamin pills can't replicate (fiber). But that actually supports the idea that people should eat more fruits and vegetables." yeah thats correct, but the argument isnt about eating more fruits and veggies, its about the pills. the explanation is clearly misguided
B doesnt exactly make sense. By telling us what Primary does, its not telling us what Secondary does. Secondary itself tells us what it does. If secondary explanation wasn't in writing, then we couldn't possibly know what it does
honestly seems ideal. using one passage already to find correct answers or to eliminate wrong ones just seems efficient
im really fed up with the questions that involve little to nothing with the text. its bad enough we have to take a tedious, bs test like the LSAT to get into law school, and yet we have to deal with crap like this
i need to get better at trusting my gut over making the switch at the end
another assumption based question. ofc thats a possible reason but it doesnt fit the extent of the passage
@PoeBoiMcGee and you keep responding, so your point is? if i didnt know better, I wouldve figured you're into me...
why should we care about the body when the heart is the only mentioned body part in the stimulus? how many times have we been criticized by the 7sage people for picking these answeers that involve "irrelevant information"?