This is now ridiculous. We were told to assume nothing and now we have to make inferrences based on "common sense"? Common sense is subjective, we cant all share the same common sense as the people making the test. Be so fr

I dont understand what i'm doing wrong, I keep getting 1/5 or 0/5

Kinda surprised I got this right but I'm still glad I did. Occam's Razor is the best tool to use ngl

i could be wrong, but i feel like referentials isnt that important

if our intuition is bound to just piece it together without the need to mentally see it and put it togetherm why do a lesson on it

Shouldnt the last one be "the cat likes to drink"? Saying "drinks milk" would be more specific and adding information that would come with the questions like "what does the cat like to drink?"

The answers are still evry nitpicky, but after seeing the xplanations, I can see how a good amount of the answers make more sense

Even though Panda Express is very good, we should eat at Wendys since its closer by and still has the things we enjoy.

Lmk if this is right

how is 5 changing the subconclusion to conclusion? its the same sentence and phrasing

so essentially, i am throwing out all logic and understanding and basing my knowledge only on the information at hand? interesting.

Hey everyone, Im and Oregon LSAT taker and planning on taking the test in August. I'm a bit worried because my GPAis a little less than ideal but im looking forward to studying and learning from this. If anyone wants to connect lmk

I love how this is essentially a mathmetically equation. If you subtract the repeated words, you're more likely able to just see right through it