This was actually nice!

@MnM The fact that we could even spot the issue after the fact is still progress because I’m sure a few months ago, we would have been completely lost as to why we were wrong 😆

@Ajohnson1 I watch the videos because there are times (rarely) where I answer it right but the reasoning is different.

Took me a while, especially the first one but 5/5 🥹

Picked B and then did the Blind Review and got it right with E.

When reading option B again, I noticed it said “will be happy”. The stim never said they WOULD be happy, only that they could be if the serious financial problems were solved. This reminded me of some of the earlier topics we studied where we were told to watch out for language that is “too strong” (will be, only, never, etc etc). I didn’t even think of it as confusing sufficiency and necessity till after.

@Elideebeep you are so lit for this. thank you!!

@HWalls2027 Some of the LR stims are really convoluted. Understanding the basics of how to break some of these statements down will definitely help. Especially on the Science questions 😵‍💫 and RC sections. You’ll be able to sift the important information from the fluff.

4.5/5 bc #4 tripped me up.

I did:

A —> B and /B —> /A

I should have done:

/A —> /B and B —> A

@MaxFoyer Ohhhh, I see. Thank you for calling that out. I was shifting based on how I was reading it instead of following the “necessary condition” rule. Thank you!

AHHHH 5/5! LETS GOOOOOO!

#4 and #5 ahhhhh

I really don’t understand #2.

Since it says “only if”, wouldn’t it make sense to be

the thing makes good business sense —> business does the environmentally “right” thing

I think this is where I get confused on necessary vs. sufficient

4/5 🥳

I reversed #2 by saying CCS —> NASA but I was able to understand why I was wrong so that’s good too.

4.5/5 because brain fog on #1 where I said ICSA (I can see Arun) rather than ICNSA (I can not see Arun). Was moving too fast 🫠 but I caught it after re-reading

The way I got this right when I was studying on LawHub and then failed it here…. ugh 😭

One difference was I definitely broke it down in a diagram when I did it before but not here. I’m just wondering how to do that without taking too much time.

@SwagOD 😭

3/5 and 5/5 with the Blond review deep sigh one of the ones I got wrong, I was between answers and the other, I got it once I paused and re-processed

I spent way more time on this question than needed because after I read the first two sentences, I had to go back and keep reading to make sure what I was reading was correct because the flow made no sense to me 🙃 it felt like someone stitched things that made no sense together and then I got to the end and was like “OH”.

#2 tripped me up on the winner part.

I need to redo the comparative section again at some point.

@paigeisabel Literally

@Hnelson88 this is what I did and from the comments, yeah it’s wrong because it’s not so much focus on the percentage of households but mores the weather days

Definitely got #5 partially wrong… what the heck lol

@caridadlopezjd Take all the time you need. Focus on nailing the concepts. Speed will come later. Doesn’t matter how fast you are if you don’t get the questions. It took me like 4 mins to get some of them but I got them right!! Focus on that for now :)

4/5

5/5 on the BR

“that” as a predicate object was tripping me out till it clicked on the third question. everything else felt good.