anyone else think that these reasonings are just lazy slop towards the end? Like yeah you can just take it face value without entirely understanding why but it definitely helps and its so lazy that its just: the previous lesson is stronger, so this is also invalid.

@KaraSwider dude if ur gonna be choosing the size w bias ofc but this is the lsat where its not cut and stone. I can draw the same diagram but with differently sized circles and different amount shaded and cna get the oppisite

I understand this and the previous bc he used star wars again making the translation easier to dissect. Wording should be reworked on both but if you are confused on the language, he is saying the second example is an incorrect translation into lawgic, but because of that, it does make it a valid argument, however that is NOT what the statements are saying and you will pick a wrong answer.

why is there no review to help understand the ones we got wrong

@HenryLehmann holy thank you I was so confused. I thought Every was group 2 so I had to go back in my notes after seeing this comment and see why I was messing up the placements

can we not use the discussion for meaningless bs... I've only seen this feature useful once every other time its jus randoms acting like its a tiktok comment section