When the AC seems so easy you dont let yourself choose it because no way its that easy and so you talk yourself into another AC. LOL oops.

@jjjellopants "at the expense of the enforcement of ethical standards" is the big part.

once you realize that 350 degrees is the same as the minimum transition temp, then the entire passage becomes easy.

This is a great POE question

I find these inference questions to be easier if I look at it through the lens of a MBT / almost a principle type question stem.

It makes sense to me when I slowed down and realized that demonstrating extenuating circumstances just means the citation wont result in a fine, but will still be a citation. I didn't want to pick A because Its not true that they will be fined, but its not the case that citations and fines are the same consequence.

So we have to make the assumption that watching your twin is the same as watching yourself and make that connection with the stimulus? Its an easy answer if you assume that but that kind of idiotic to assume that your twin=you.

@sesh561 this is the best explanation

/ capable make changes -> / capable of complex reasoning

capable of complex reasoning -> capable make changes

This is one of those questions where AC C doesn't strongly support the argument, but every other AC is so bad and irrelevant that you have no choice but to choose AC C.

I got it right, but this is a stupid question lol.

I find it easiest to skip the first 2 sentences and take the contrapositive of the next sentence so you can make it all positive. Switching "if a public space is uncomfortable it is not well designed" into "if it is well designed, it is comfortable." Then, just assign the "a - b - c = a - c" logic to "well designed - comfortable - spacious interiors = well designed - spacious interiors. " This gives you D relatively easily.

@EllieBBBB I just highlight part of it when its wrong, but having the hide button back would be nice.

@CMRT Yes

If people who have a genetic predisposition to Parkinson's have the same or less iron in their diets than people without the predisposition, wouldn't that just prove that genetics is a factor and not the iron intake? I got it right because the other answers are very wrong and this ones questionable but I don't understand at all how that's a strengthener?