- Joined
- Sep 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I know this might not be super helpful but all I’ll say is just keep chipping away. With 7Sage you have all the resources in front of you to improve, so just make sure you use them. I’ve found some success from taking a weekly practice test (though you can burn through these quickly,) and through explaining why a question is wrong or right to myself on paper. Once you understand the rationale for an answer choice’s correctness (or lack thereof) you build confidence. Once you build confidence, then you’re able to hold it together during a test and not let your nerves get to you. That is why you do blind review too, because it shows you that you can figure out these questions, but the main issue is timing. I hope that helps!
I can relate. On my last 5 tests I’ve got scores between 158 - 162. Even when I try to make sure my timing is right I manage to score poorly (averaging -7 per section.) I think I’m going to keep plugging away, but I’m not sure how to improve other than maybe by trying to take more time on individual questions rather than rushing.
Hey all,
I have been PTing in the low 160s for my last three attempts, which I am pretty excited about. I have also been trying to take more time to review my wrong questions, flagged questions, and just generally have trying to more actively participate in Blind Review (I used to just skip through so I could see my score...)
I do truly think and believe I can get up to any score on this test given the right timeframe. My dream schools are WashU and Northwestern, which would require a big jump in LSAT scores before August 8th, which is when I am taking my next official LSAT. I was wondering if anyone had some advice on how to improve quickly, because I am thinking I will need to retake the exam after August, with the long term goal of not having to delay my application for a year.
If WashU or Northwestern do not work out, I am thinking of applying to UIUC, Mizzou, University of Wisconsin, University of Washington, and maybe Marquette or Pittsburgh as other options. I am sure I would be able to experience a great education at any of these schools, but the question then becomes: Can I can get my LSAT score high enough?
What tips helped you the most with improving your score? I usually finish each section with two minutes to go, and will go back and review flagged questions. I am studying about an hour a day during the week, and then have been trying to PT on the weekends. The issue with PTing so often is that I am running out of fresh PLSATs to take. I am sure there are ways to find more points within this test, so if you could let me know of any tricks worked for you, that would be awesome. These tricks can include small test day tips or maybe different study programs you used too. Anything will be helpful!
Maybe this is a silly question, but do only witnesses give testimonies during trials?
@02kimask That's exactly what I was thinking too. What happens if the criminal accidentally becomes a criminal? I get that E is MORE correct, but it is still a frustrating question.
Hello,
I’ve taken 3 PTs in the last 3 weeks in preparation for the June test, and I have got a 158 each time. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t mind this score. I think it’s ok and it’s absolutely better than previous scores I’ve got (including my 156 for the April test), but I am trying to figure out how to improve on it before next weekend. I know that’s not much time but I ran into timing issues with the last PT and just felt so fatigued that I knew I didn’t do well on the rest. I truly think I can get my score up to a 165, but what I’m wondering is if there are any tips or tricks out there that people have to suggest either preparation wise or test taking wise. I can put the time in, I’ve taken multiple PTs, I’ve done the core curriculum (or most of it), I just want to know what else I can do to push past the high 150s. I might retake in August but if I can do well enough this weekend to avoid that, that would be ideal. Thanks!
How much reading are you doing outside of the LSAT? Also, how good is your LR generally? RC is essentially longform LR, so I’d say depending on how good your LR is, just take a bit more time with reading and also finding evidence in the text (even for implied questions) for your answer choices.
Maybe you can do a bit of both? I don’t see why doing the core curriculum would be a bad thing. Are there specific question types you are getting wrong frequently? If that’s the case, then go to the core curriculum lessons on those question types. It can feel a bit slow but it is definitely helpful to have those foundational concepts in your brain.
Should it really be a "some" arrow here in between the Hallstown and Frozen Dinners Regularly conditionals in the stimulus?
I am so stupid. I wondered what the LSAT meant by position - I thought it meant post or role, not opinion or idea (or treatment plan)
This question really annoys me because the correct answer relies on the fact that you are thinking too narrowly about the definition of reducing smoking. I know answer choice C is correct, but the LSAT is LSATing and it frustrates me.
@calliekoskovich Yeah I second this opinion about PTs. I usually try to take a PT on Saturday and then review it on Sunday. If I am feeling energetic I will try to combine this into just Saturday. Mostly though, I spend some time at work doing practice questions (the priority tab on the drill section is very helpful for this, to just take 5 questions at a time, to truly target the questions that are troubling you the most)
Hey all, I took my writing portion late for the April test, how long will it take for them to approve my sample and release my score? Thanks!
@iwillcrushthelsat Interesting. Is it specific types of passages (ie. Science, or Law or whatever) that you are doing worse on?
I think it’s mostly just reps, that way you get to be more intuitive about RC in general. Obviously the BR is going to help and the explanation videos can be good too for some passive learning. At least for me, the things I have found to be most fruitful are repetition and if I begin to plateau then trying do so some research about what could be wrong about my approach.
I think it’s also important to remember with RC that it’s essentially just long form LR, which for you, should indicate that it’s a fatigue problem, no?
@k13lawwwwww Understood. What exactly are admissions counsel's looking for? Is it mostly clarity or just that you can write in an organized way? I just did a practice exam and ran out of time.
I am taking the writing section today with the goal of taking my first official exam this Saturday, which I am quite nervous about. What should I expect for the writing section? I know its 50 minutes, with 15 being preparation and 35 being writing time. I majored in English and History in undergrad so I am familiar with writing papers, albeit with a far wider timeframe than the one we receive. Does anyone have any last minute tips?
Thank you!
Also, E is wrong because knowing a consequence is different from evaluating a consequence
@LawyeRell Literally same. I was so mad once I got to reviewing this, because I thought indispensable meant that you cannot dispense it (ie., it cannot be used...) I got even more upset when I realized there is a line in Hamilton (which I am a big fan of) where Burr describes Hamilton as having made himself "indispensable," to Washington (which makes the necessary component a bit more clear; although the knowledge of the show is INDISPENSABLE for you to know that.)
So I’m in a similar boat. I’ve been studying for about 4 months, while working 2 jobs. My best and most recent PT score was a 154, which I think is okay without being great. I’ve found that the things that made a difference for me were relying on my Google Calendar heavily (so every weekend I look ahead at the coming and week and try to schedule out my study sessions), creating a plan of my own (which is built from the 7Sage curriculum), and like lots of people have said in the comments, giving myself some grace and being open to the possibility that the LSAT is at least interesting.
I’ve also created a study log on Google Sheets just to keep track of my weekly hours, my confidence levels, and patterns of study, in order to try and produce some data regarding what drills or how many hours a week will improve my score.
Also, take some time for yourself. I try to read a chapter of a book every day, and am making more of an active effort to work out daily. I also really value time with my friends and family, since that takes my mind off the LSAT.
Maybe these tips will work for you! I think the most important thing to mention about these tips however, is that they are built from past experience and other people’s tips, but include some of my own flair when they are put into practice.
Hi I have a quick question on Question 19. My issue with this question is that I selected answer choice D twice (both on the test and in BR). The 7 Sage explanation claims that D is "Not supported, because passage B does focus on gender." I can completely see that this is true, and on the 3rd go around, I selected E, since the second passage seems to show how looking at gender can be a useful lens through which to view politics and culture. My issue, however, arises from the notion that we do not know when the second passage was written. The phrase in answer choice D that bothers me is "much recent historical scholarship." How do we know (if we can in fact, know) that Passage B, let alone Passage A, was written recently? Also, if it WAS written recently (which we have no way of determining), how can we tell what defines recent? I am thinking that these questions surrounding a technicality could be helpful for someone trying to solve this question. I also do think that this says something about my approach to this question, since it appears I am doing POE rather than "hunting" for answers. Regardless, some clarity on when these passages were written would be helpful.
@LauraRizzler yeah I kind of figure it’s just like growing pains but I didn’t realize it would be this severe. It’s also like 7sage is not cheap so I really want to keep at it and try and get my money’s worth
I guess E makes sense because it means that modern historians are merely projecting modern day categorizations onto people that did not even know such categories existed.