The videos because for some reason hearing you or JY explain questions becomes the voice in my head when I do new questions, which helps me get them right.
As I use a public computer most of the time, I use the written explanations more. But sometimes if I still am confused after reading the written explanation I check the video ones when I get home.
When I was just starting out, video explanations helped because I needed to further understand the concept. Now that I understand the concepts, I use the written explanations because it just is a quick reminder of what I did wrong and I don't need further explanation about the concept itself.
i mainly use the written explanations, and if i still cant understand it, i'll use the video. i prefer the written explanation because it helps me see easier where i was lacking. if that is not enough, that means i dont understand the concept, so i'll watch the video
I mainly use the video explanation, hearing it makes it easier for me to repeat the part that isn't clicking in my head as opposed to trying to break down the one or two sentences on my own (if they're not immediately clicking).
I only use the written explanations, but often find that they do not provide enough explanation for their reasoning. It is especially frustrating when questions with formal logic, such as conditional reasoning questions, do not provide the mapped out logic. For example, the analysis for the stimulus may or may not provide a logic map, and the answer choices usually do not provide a logic map. I would like to see more written explanations that include a logic map of what that answer choice says and why it is wrong (i.e. it does not match with what the question is asking or does not fit into the formal logic of the stimulus). A lot of the explanations just say "this is not supported." without explaining why and how.
If I get the question right, then for review, I'll only read the written explanations. If I get it wrong, I'll immediately jump to the video explanations.
I have mostly used the video explanations. However, if I get the question wrong in my 1st try and in my blind review I will look at the light bulb to gain some insight because I am obviously perplexed. I always watch the videos afterwards in those situations. I like the videos because they are in depth and address the reasons why we might make certain mistakes and why wrong answers are tempting. Furthermore, on the more difficult questions there is often a concept in the stimulus that I misunderstood. In making the concepts clear, the video shows that there IS a right answer. Without that assurance I would be more nervous taking the actual test.
I look at written explanations first, then watch videos if those don't explain it well. I sometimes jump to the video first if a question was really hard and I just want to watch someone explain it step-by-step. It's oftentimes more useful if the written explanations offer both the explanation given in the video AND a different way of reaching the same conclusion/eliminating the wrong answer choice/selecting the right one. That way there's multiple ways of understanding how to get to the right outcome.
I prefer the written explanations because I sometimes get distracted when trying to watch the videos. If the written doesn't help me understand what went wrong, then I will watch the video!!
Written only, because I don't often have the patience for video explanations since they contain a more full explanation whereas I usually only require the bits and pieces I got wrong, if that makes sense. I often only require the brief explanations regarding the answer I chose wrong and the answer that was right; the breakdown of the question itself is something I am already comfortable with.
I use both. If I get a question right, I will use the written explanations only if I want more clarification. If I get a question wrong, however, I will read all the written explanations, and then watch the video too, to ensure that I fully understand why I got the question wrong and how to get it right in the future.
one of the main reasons I went from 7sage to lsat demon are the comments!!! I love reading peoples comments on how they approached the same question in different ways. It is also quite humerous because it reminds me of tik tok comments. I have never watched anhy of those long videos of the 40 minutes of rambling. and even if I did it was always Kevins
I wish there were some videos with a breakdown of how someone would solve it in real time. The instructor could pause the video and explain their reasoning and what they are looking at/for.
This would particularly be helpful for approach. The current videos are definitely helpful but the more condensed version would be perfect in terms of application of principles in a timed setting.
Both! If i'm very puzzled, or it's very hard then the Video and it's still not clicking then the Light Bulb. But if I BRed it correctly then only the Light Bulb
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
60 comments
The videos because for some reason hearing you or JY explain questions becomes the voice in my head when I do new questions, which helps me get them right.
I use the light bulb first, just as a first resort, and then I use the video explanation if I still don't understand the lightbulb tip.
video so i can hear someone explain! but in 2x speed
I'm a visual learner so I solely rely on the videos. The videos are also more in depth usually than the written explanations which I like.
I use the written explanations first and then go to the video explanations. The reason I do this is because of how I learn.
As I use a public computer most of the time, I use the written explanations more. But sometimes if I still am confused after reading the written explanation I check the video ones when I get home.
When I was just starting out, video explanations helped because I needed to further understand the concept. Now that I understand the concepts, I use the written explanations because it just is a quick reminder of what I did wrong and I don't need further explanation about the concept itself.
both, but the written explanations are quicker and easier to check
I like both. Video makes it clearer than light bulb. I need more help in questions that require you to apply knowledge about valid argument forms
i mainly use the written explanations, and if i still cant understand it, i'll use the video. i prefer the written explanation because it helps me see easier where i was lacking. if that is not enough, that means i dont understand the concept, so i'll watch the video
I mainly use the video explanation, hearing it makes it easier for me to repeat the part that isn't clicking in my head as opposed to trying to break down the one or two sentences on my own (if they're not immediately clicking).
I only use the written explanations, but often find that they do not provide enough explanation for their reasoning. It is especially frustrating when questions with formal logic, such as conditional reasoning questions, do not provide the mapped out logic. For example, the analysis for the stimulus may or may not provide a logic map, and the answer choices usually do not provide a logic map. I would like to see more written explanations that include a logic map of what that answer choice says and why it is wrong (i.e. it does not match with what the question is asking or does not fit into the formal logic of the stimulus). A lot of the explanations just say "this is not supported." without explaining why and how.
Written only. I can read the explanation in (obviously) a fraction of the time it takes to watch the video and move on far quicker.
If I get the question right, then for review, I'll only read the written explanations. If I get it wrong, I'll immediately jump to the video explanations.
I have mostly used the video explanations. However, if I get the question wrong in my 1st try and in my blind review I will look at the light bulb to gain some insight because I am obviously perplexed. I always watch the videos afterwards in those situations. I like the videos because they are in depth and address the reasons why we might make certain mistakes and why wrong answers are tempting. Furthermore, on the more difficult questions there is often a concept in the stimulus that I misunderstood. In making the concepts clear, the video shows that there IS a right answer. Without that assurance I would be more nervous taking the actual test.
I use both, but I prefer the video explanations on 1.5 or 2X speed lol
I only use the videos. I find the way you explain question there in live time to be super clarifying.
I look at written explanations first, then watch videos if those don't explain it well. I sometimes jump to the video first if a question was really hard and I just want to watch someone explain it step-by-step. It's oftentimes more useful if the written explanations offer both the explanation given in the video AND a different way of reaching the same conclusion/eliminating the wrong answer choice/selecting the right one. That way there's multiple ways of understanding how to get to the right outcome.
I prefer the written explanations because I sometimes get distracted when trying to watch the videos. If the written doesn't help me understand what went wrong, then I will watch the video!!
Written only, because I don't often have the patience for video explanations since they contain a more full explanation whereas I usually only require the bits and pieces I got wrong, if that makes sense. I often only require the brief explanations regarding the answer I chose wrong and the answer that was right; the breakdown of the question itself is something I am already comfortable with.
I use both. If I get a question right, I will use the written explanations only if I want more clarification. If I get a question wrong, however, I will read all the written explanations, and then watch the video too, to ensure that I fully understand why I got the question wrong and how to get it right in the future.
I use both. If the questions are extremely confusing, I will watch the videos, use the light bulb, and read the comments.
one of the main reasons I went from 7sage to lsat demon are the comments!!! I love reading peoples comments on how they approached the same question in different ways. It is also quite humerous because it reminds me of tik tok comments. I have never watched anhy of those long videos of the 40 minutes of rambling. and even if I did it was always Kevins
I wish there were some videos with a breakdown of how someone would solve it in real time. The instructor could pause the video and explain their reasoning and what they are looking at/for.
This would particularly be helpful for approach. The current videos are definitely helpful but the more condensed version would be perfect in terms of application of principles in a timed setting.
Both! If i'm very puzzled, or it's very hard then the Video and it's still not clicking then the Light Bulb. But if I BRed it correctly then only the Light Bulb