- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
It's a little harder to see now and it looks like they made it light gray on gray?
Does this give significantly more weight to GPA? For example I put a 3.7 GPA and a 180 LSAT and essentially everything in the top 25 is labeled a reach
I have had to go to a paragraph and manually count each sentence too many times
Hey all! To give more context, I am doing my LSAT prep while working full time so I really have to balance the value I get from my drills with the amount of drills I do! I've noticed that the medium length for a practice block is too much for me as I usually have to sacrifice some part of my day to do my WAJ for all of those drills. However, the light length for the practice block is too little and I'd have to supplement it with my own drills anyway leaving me with not a great use for it. What I think would be really useful would be a manual process to structure each day in the practice block because I'd love to do one section a day + 1 or 2 drill sets 4 days a week, rest and then do my PT on Saturday and review Sunday. So basically being able to say on day 1, I want to add one LR section and one tutor's pick drills and then on day 2 say I want to add an LR section + only 1 drill targeting my weaknesses or something like that, basically just more thorough control over how a practice block is structured.
I love this little critter, it’s a really good motivator and when I need to reason something or have it give suggestions on my WAJ it does a great job. When I’m struggling with something as well it gives great advice that works. However, you can tell once the chat has run off too long because it starts referencing the same 5 things from the beginning of the conversation and god forbid you say something about doing this and going to bed, it’s gonna reference that forever. I think it’d be really helpful to automatically start a new chat every day or something to that effect instead of being forced to when it degrades too much.
Hey guys! I have just finished the LR portion in the core curriculum so now I am on the RC section and I am really struggling to eliminate wrong answers in RC. For every RC question I can safely eliminate at least 2 wrong answers but then I really struggle to find reasons to eliminate the last 2. It just seems so much fuzzier then LR where it's very clear that there are 4 wrong answers. Any tips?
I currently use a google sheet for a WAJ, would love a similar feature on 7sage that allows me to deep link questions and has accelerators to add these questions and analytics built in
Can we get one for sufficient->necessary? This was great and really engaging which helped make the material stick
Hey guys, I've been studying for a couple of weeks now and it feels like I am missing most of my answers because I've developed a poor habit of not actively reading and missing some words on LR questions. Has anyone experienced this before? If so, what were some remedies?
Am I crazy to say that I can't notice a difference?