I also picked C for this reason. I think it's because that paragraph is talking about the autobiographical genre collection in general. The question specifically asks about the ones that the author highlights (In the third paragraph), which they then go on to describe as "multigeneric"

I chose B and had trouble understanding why it wasn't the answer, someone double check if this is correct? :)

This is the opposite of the information given. This says: correctly identified as mini -> in an unsuitable pot; if the plants are correctly labeled, then they are unsuitable for pot. COMPLETE OPPOSITE.

For the explanation of A, are progressive/conservative and feminism not political identities?

I thought it was C because it has to do with the perception of the candidates from the population. So I thought if people are voting based on the candidate's character and not their arguments, it undermines what any of the arguments are. What am I mixing up here?

A: The premise doesn’t mention anything about lower floors; we don’t need or know this.

B: Too strong.

C & D: we don't have enough information about the rest of the building

E: UF -m-> SV <-s-> S

Explanation C mentions us not knowing whether he acted improperly, but the premise literally says "Greenville's mayor acted improperly..." AM I MISING SOMETHING??

How do I know this "or," is not either or? I eliminated C due to this reasoning.

One thing I’m learning is if the answer choices are super wordy it’s most likely 5 stars, and if there’s a word the average person wouldn’t understand it just might be the answer 😂

My issue is I understand what is flawed with the argument, but then the answer choices, of course, are designed to trip us up with the wording.

The explanation for D already confused me with the phrase "we want to establish what fruit is safe to eat." I understand, but are negations not allowed?

I had A chosen but then swapped to E. I thought it could be a possible negation of waht the principle says, is that not a rule with this question type?

What does C even mean?

So far, when choosing an answer, it's always within the first few I read, then I waste time going through other answer choices to be sure...

For these SA questions, would it help to look at it like strengthen? In terms of helping us conclude? Because I chose E, which I believe is factually correct, but it's not the answer because it doesn't help us conclude?

So essentially, if the answer choice mentions something the stimulus doesn't most likely not the answer? POE, then double-check if the final answer follows the causal chain?

For these, after reading the stimulus, I understand what the issue is, but going through the answer choices i'm not sure how it would be worded.

I got it right, and the practice helped A LOT, but I did have to write it out. Will I just naturally get faster over time?

this was easy... maybe too easy?

I went through this asking myself why it was necessary and was about to skip. I'm glad I didn't! I'm noticing small things in comparative questions now!!

@ErikKrauss Put what you know and don't know aside and only use the information given! The comparison is about which is smaller, so despite what our own opinions may be, the 'winner' would be large animals

First 5/5 on my first try!! But that timing is BRUTAL.

@KrystalGrullon You got these flipped! Being uncomfortable all day was a result of your pants being too short. "Pants being too short" gives support to being uncomfortable all day.