- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
One thing I’m learning is if the answer choices are super wordy it’s most likely 5 stars, and if there’s a word the average person wouldn’t understand it just might be the answer 😂
My issue is I understand what is flawed with the argument, but then the answer choices, of course, are designed to trip us up with the wording.
The explanation for D already confused me with the phrase "we want to establish what fruit is safe to eat." I understand, but are negations not allowed?
I had A chosen but then swapped to E. I thought it could be a possible negation of waht the principle says, is that not a rule with this question type?
So far, when choosing an answer, it's always within the first few I read, then I waste time going through other answer choices to be sure...
For these SA questions, would it help to look at it like strengthen? In terms of helping us conclude? Because I chose E, which I believe is factually correct, but it's not the answer because it doesn't help us conclude?
So essentially, if the answer choice mentions something the stimulus doesn't most likely not the answer? POE, then double-check if the final answer follows the causal chain?
For these, after reading the stimulus, I understand what the issue is, but going through the answer choices i'm not sure how it would be worded.
I got it right, and the practice helped A LOT, but I did have to write it out. Will I just naturally get faster over time?
I went through this asking myself why it was necessary and was about to skip. I'm glad I didn't! I'm noticing small things in comparative questions now!!
@ErikKrauss Put what you know and don't know aside and only use the information given! The comparison is about which is smaller, so despite what our own opinions may be, the 'winner' would be large animals
How do I know this "or," is not either or? I eliminated C due to this reasoning.