Took me longer to answer, but I got it correct the first time. I was worried because the concepts in this module has been challenging for me to wrap my head around. Happy to see it paying off. I cannot wait to master the timing part
Got both the actual and the BR wrong, but upon review its dang obvious. I'll have to re-read my notes and see if I can't hammer this topic into my brain properly. Not gonna get too bummed about it though. We're all still practicing and its important to celebrate failure as a chance to see our sore spots and hone them. Godspeed, you goobers, and may we all have good luck and fortitude going foreward
Got it right but it took me a while to map it out. Need to work on timing! Hopefully with more practice it becomes more intuitive and I don't need to map it out. I feel like on the LSAT I won't have time to map each one out
May need more clarity. I chose E, but I mapped it out differently with the translation being happy --> financial problems are solved. Based on this, I didn't pick B because if their financial problems are solved they are not considered serious. Group 2 automatically makes the first idea a necessary condition.
i don't know if there is one yet, but if not, I highly encourage a video solely on deciphering language of the questions being asked. I didn't know "properly inferred" meant "must be true"...
Thank you 7 sage, all the training up until this question really has been helping, i really see it now. The answers just seemed so much easier to eliminate, and I had good reasons for eliminating them, still need to get faster but one of my fastest questions!
Picked B and then did the Blind Review and got it right with E.
When reading option B again, I noticed it said “will be happy”. The stim never said they WOULD be happy, only that they could be if the serious financial problems were solved. This reminded me of some of the earlier topics we studied where we were told to watch out for language that is “too strong” (will be, only, never, etc etc). I didn’t even think of it as confusing sufficiency and necessity till after.
@MnM The fact that we could even spot the issue after the fact is still progress because I’m sure a few months ago, we would have been completely lost as to why we were wrong 😆
I answered wrong the first time then once i did blind review i got it correct, I had to think about "hmm am i switching necessity and sufficient up? and once i thought that that MAY be a possibliblity, I looked back at what I wrote, which idea was on whihc side, adn realized E is the only one that matches the conclusion I drew, with the the sides matching the "if, then" statemnt in answer choice E. Also, my bad for mispelled words, my grammarly is off
56 comments
i cant belive how quick i did this question i love you 7sage
I just put out the worlds craziest happy dance bc i got this right first try. (went a lil over in time but WE TAKE OUR WINS SERIOUS HERE)
Took me longer to answer, but I got it correct the first time. I was worried because the concepts in this module has been challenging for me to wrap my head around. Happy to see it paying off. I cannot wait to master the timing part
@mmfisher1 same just need to master the timing part!
Got it right but completely overlooked the fact that the first sentence can also be translated into lawgic
Got both the actual and the BR wrong, but upon review its dang obvious. I'll have to re-read my notes and see if I can't hammer this topic into my brain properly. Not gonna get too bummed about it though. We're all still practicing and its important to celebrate failure as a chance to see our sore spots and hone them. Godspeed, you goobers, and may we all have good luck and fortitude going foreward
Got it right but it took me a while to map it out. Need to work on timing! Hopefully with more practice it becomes more intuitive and I don't need to map it out. I feel like on the LSAT I won't have time to map each one out
I got it right! I've struggled a bit with this module so it felt very rewarding to get this right on the first try!
I have no idea why I chose C at first but got it right during BR.
I got it right, and the practice helped A LOT, but I did have to write it out. Will I just naturally get faster over time?
got it right but it literally took me forever
@cmata Same, same.
May need more clarity. I chose E, but I mapped it out differently with the translation being happy --> financial problems are solved. Based on this, I didn't pick B because if their financial problems are solved they are not considered serious. Group 2 automatically makes the first idea a necessary condition.
Got it wrong on my first try but nailed it on the BR lol small wins yay
I mapped it out exactly how he did but still picked the wrong answer lol
45 seconds under time lets go
i don't know if there is one yet, but if not, I highly encourage a video solely on deciphering language of the questions being asked. I didn't know "properly inferred" meant "must be true"...
clicked the right answer then completely talked myself out of it LMFAO back to the drawing board
@CScheresky and yet, it was one step ahead of what I got. I was between D and E, but completely missed the "only if"...
did anybody use cannot as a indicator??
@StarBrooks Yes! I used SFI -> /H and then H -> /SFI which led me to the conclusion and I saw the correct answer right away
Woohoo first comment
Thank you 7 sage, all the training up until this question really has been helping, i really see it now. The answers just seemed so much easier to eliminate, and I had good reasons for eliminating them, still need to get faster but one of my fastest questions!
it was almost like magic using lawgic to solve this. wow
Picked B and then did the Blind Review and got it right with E.
When reading option B again, I noticed it said “will be happy”. The stim never said they WOULD be happy, only that they could be if the serious financial problems were solved. This reminded me of some of the earlier topics we studied where we were told to watch out for language that is “too strong” (will be, only, never, etc etc). I didn’t even think of it as confusing sufficiency and necessity till after.
@HiGigi same!! I knew it was wrong but fixated on the word "solve"😭
@MnM The fact that we could even spot the issue after the fact is still progress because I’m sure a few months ago, we would have been completely lost as to why we were wrong 😆
@HiGigi You are right. A win is a win!😎
I answered wrong the first time then once i did blind review i got it correct, I had to think about "hmm am i switching necessity and sufficient up? and once i thought that that MAY be a possibliblity, I looked back at what I wrote, which idea was on whihc side, adn realized E is the only one that matches the conclusion I drew, with the the sides matching the "if, then" statemnt in answer choice E. Also, my bad for mispelled words, my grammarly is off
finally feeling more confident
definitely took a while but got the right answer, practice will help to solidify it and make it second nature hopefully!
Took me a while but got it correct. I say don't worry about time for right not.