so question: when we get these types of questions is ever that obvious like the method was to detect prey so the answer choice should have something to do detecting prey also or no?

so were not to use the negation test right off the bat? then what are we supposed to use? i thought the negation test was a great way to find the answer right off the bat

i saw the flaw but i threw out A because it said there was a negative consequence but i dont see how increasoing the your chances of avoiding heart disease is a negative.

i had it down to C and E but i kept thinking it couldve been in inference because the economist was using the evidence to come to the conclusion that the economy was heading out of recession

i didnt understand this one at all.

i solved this incorrectly even though i got to the right answer. i had originally saw "guaranteed" as an absolute conditional instead of a "most"

fucking Pat. its because it doesnt say that pat is a member or not a member. if he/she was a member then they would have to follow the rules but we can assume theyre not a member

i honestly didnt like this passage. i couldnt follow it very much

ugh stupid me! i thought by saying people "correctly believed" was too strong

i understand why B is correct but for questions like this should we look for an answer that talks about one of the 3 reasons the historians give as to why there was a decline?

#help

i think A shouldve been the correct answer here. the passage says he would have his musicians improvise from a base script. which is analgous to ac A

i got question 13 wrong because the beginning of the paragraph talks about language and how the sources are written in latin and anglo-french