- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Free
i saw the flaw but i threw out A because it said there was a negative consequence but i dont see how increasoing the your chances of avoiding heart disease is a negative.
i solved this incorrectly even though i got to the right answer. i had originally saw "guaranteed" as an absolute conditional instead of a "most"
fucking Pat. its because it doesnt say that pat is a member or not a member. if he/she was a member then they would have to follow the rules but we can assume theyre not a member
@leburger my motivation to you is look at this an not a mistake but as a way of getting better than your 160's score. i thought i could do the same and just get a good score to be able to go to law school. im not in the same situation as you as i took a pt two weeks ago and i got a 134. i didnt even finish and i had to guess and here i thought i was doin great but my motivational advice to you would be to get back out there. the prep youve done still counts most people wouldve quit but you didnt. reschedule as soon as you can even if its a few months away. this wasnt the unicerse telling you youre done it was giving you a bonus round to level u your score so that you can get a scholarship. applying early will get you a headstart when applications start opening up. you got this
i honestly didnt like this passage. i couldnt follow it very much
ugh stupid me! i thought by saying people "correctly believed" was too strong
i understand why B is correct but for questions like this should we look for an answer that talks about one of the 3 reasons the historians give as to why there was a decline?
#help
i think A shouldve been the correct answer here. the passage says he would have his musicians improvise from a base script. which is analgous to ac A
i got question 13 wrong because the beginning of the paragraph talks about language and how the sources are written in latin and anglo-french
so question: when we get these types of questions is ever that obvious like the method was to detect prey so the answer choice should have something to do detecting prey also or no?
i had it down to C and E but i kept thinking it couldve been in inference because the economist was using the evidence to come to the conclusion that the economy was heading out of recession
so were not to use the negation test right off the bat? then what are we supposed to use? i thought the negation test was a great way to find the answer right off the bat