For these causation questions, when I'm trying to weaken, I'm always thinking and looking for that alternative explanation.

@joszam006 Many is used as a filler word for "alot" but the stimulus said "Each of the many" which means "all" or "everyone" who participated.

@OliverJakacki Thats a good question.

@ElyS Most should intuitively become more than half when you use it. 50% + 1

@ErikKrauss i dont think so. Youre trying to say

If Cat -> Than Mammal

If Dog -> Than Mammal

--------------------

Dog -> Cat

If it was a conditional chain (x -> A -> B) like:

Luke -> Force User -> Jedi

then you can break it up like x -> B or A->B

I like the underlying lesson, but what is the purpose of Lawgic, on test day we are not going to have time nor the ability to write everything out.

@SheaStarrs Soccer Player --> Person Who can Dribble, thus it can never be Person Who Can Dribble --> BasketBall Player.

@SofiaHaddon assumptions are the missing premise (link) that either the conclusion follows organically or if false, completely wrecks or weakens it. After identifying the premises and conclusion, we have to ask ourselves, is their something missing that would tie this whole thing up more neatly?

@MariahMay29 total of 75-77 questions that are graded. Yes, which is why you should take your time and get as many right as you can.