- Joined
- Jun 2026
- Subscription
- Core
just a chud trying to make it out
Admissions profile
Discussions
@Kevin_Lin fair enough, i’m hoping it’s okay to skip them for now then?
@BPTheGifted I think he meant that there weren't any formal lessons on specific LR question types yet
@mutayeb i get that but all it does is stir the pot and make you also look bad
guys if im doing this untimed is there really a point in doing BR right now?
justice for KJD students 🥺 I'm class of 2028 and can't set it to that
@mutayeb damn bro we're all just trying to learn (mine is 20% lolll)
also don't be shaming someone for being vocal about their confusions gangy
@OliverJakacki before someone corrects me i just realized that /A -> B literally means that everything that is not A is B. which makes no sense.
so would negating the some statement also mean that
A -> /B is the same as /A -> B ?
@dplsawyers im not gonna lie, you have a point, but unfortunately, the lsat does not care about being sound lol.
just assume that being well-trained does actually mean that you didn't avoid training and its still logically valid.
if i wanted to flip a "most" claim, would it be valid to just change "most" to "some?"
Does the implicit version actually guarantee that it doesn't include all?
You say it's "almost certainly" true that all is excluded, but what if there is a case that, despite the challenges of reading, everyone in that class knows how to read?
@OliverJakacki okay so i just searched it up and apparently its a common assumption that the word "some" goes both ways. What guarantees that there is one that isn't though, is the word not all.
glad I looked into this because apparently it's also an old trick that LSAC likes to do, where some = not all
edit: bro talked about it in the next video 🤦♂️
I've always thought that "some" would also guarantee that there is at least one in the group that does not fit that category.
so why do you say some could mean all?
@PierceBerardi I think they only say its only one and not two because I remember seeing that the answer choices on the test usually say "at least one" so its probably just a pointer for a future topic
im genuinely having a hard time understanding why these drills are important to do already when there hasn't been any practice on solving actual LR problems.
I don't know if it's just me, but these questions don't feel entirely relevant to what the lessons have taught so far either.
will it hurt me if i wait until I hit on the LR lessons before I go back to these? it just feels like I'm fighting an uphill battle at the moment
i might just be thinking too much, but is it an assumption that the bomb was the assassination attempt, or is that just a given
i'm on such a sleep deprivation that I ruled out the right answer because it didn't strengthen it lmao I guess I know i'm not completely screwed but I either need more caffeine or more sleep