I thought flawed answers were supposed to be general?? IDK!

So it is a good idea to believe that every time there is a questions (rhetorical) and a quick answer after that, that would be the conclusion. I read it as "The position of a car driver's seat probably does have a significant impact on driving safety." was the conclusion because it is (for lack of better terms) taking a stance and the following sentences were the premise. Am very far off on this? #help

REAL.

I hvae gotten every drill question wrong in this section. On this final 5 question drill I got 4/5 right. I only got the first one wrong. On the second one I said to myself " Okay, what is NECESSARY" and it is like the answers jumped out at me. So I did that for the rest. It might've just now clicked in my brain but that is my very unhelpful helpful advice.

Can someone tell me why I narrow it down to two AC. One that is the correct one and one that is completely wrong... AND I CHOSE THE WRONG ONE EACH TIME!!! Ugh! Waiting for this stuff to click...

nvm

My first 5/5 difficulty question correct!!! This section is bringing me back to life!

These have taken all the confidence I had and threw it violently into the interstate.

Im so cooked

LOVEEEE when I get the question wrong AND go over the target time! SO FUN!

I read through all options and decided that A was right. Then I re-read E and realized the Stim was concluding more heavily on the term "during infancy" not just about family size. I made the logical assumption that "infancy" would be referring to 1 year olds and younger, so I picked E. Yay me!

If i'm having an increased amount of difficulty parsing through the choice then I will watch. Otherwise, J.Y. can sometimes confuse me even if I get it right. If it isn't broke, don't fix it!

Agreed. A was one I marked out almost immediately. It literally seems to be oppo from what the actual stim states. Would've been my go to for a RRE EXCEPT question... #feedback

3/5 right. Not as cooked as I once thought!

Im so cooked chat