Did anyone see the word "Without" And apply group 3 translation rule negated the sufficient condition and kept it sufficient hence leading to D ?

To everyone who feels stuck keep going just get the basic idea and move on because this stuff is rubbish

You know what I am just gonna find the core of the sentence I got Sabotage Vote will backfire... 7sage just expects me to know... Like these explanation are nonsense

1/3 took it twice ----- 1/3 don`t feel bad we get punched twice and we get back up.... Review review review..

Note:subsidiary conclusion means intermediate conclusion ( meaning its like a conclusion that leads to another conclusion.)

D is wrong because their was multiple considerations not just one.....

This question is horrid first of all how do you not even know that removing milk has negative effects ? is that not bringing outside information. D seems more reasonable because premises was about eating less fat for heart health. Then our conclusion spoke about good health. You can have avoided heart disease but have good health. I don`t know if anyone can explain.