Is C essentially ruling out the possibility that carbon dioxide and water may act in different ways?

can someone explain what depraved means in this context lol

@skhadeejat5329 would you mind explaining the HIV/AIDS analogy please?

what kind of flaw is this

anyone have any tips for how to spot equivocation errors on tough questions like this one?

i honestly feel like the reason i am getting all these RC questions correct is because Kevin explained the passage so well...gonna need to bring him to my test

2 of the questions that appeared in this drill were ones I had already seen in this module. Please fix this #feedback

I am having so much trouble linking the premises and conclusion for these SA questions. Can anyone share any strategies they have used?

@vxsinha96118 this is so helpful thanks! I'm jsut having trouble understanding how you know you can link up the G/e with the HRWM/

When doing weakening questions, I always say to myself to look for the answer choice that if used as the conclusion instead, makes the argument a lot stronger.

Does anyone have a sort of tactic/question like this that they ask for strengthening questions? I am having a lot of trouble.

I am having trouble understanding what it means to "weaken" the reasoning. I know it means weakening the support, but am just confused how that would appear in this kind of question. Is it essentially asking which answer choice is a stronger alternative to the conclusion given in the question?

Hi, just to clarify, are you able to rule out B and C since they compare a quality of bug zappers that is not mentioned at all in the stimulus?

@Yashbrowns are you able to share any tips used to perfect MSS questions??

@danaizhaw12 I am also struggling with the MSS questions and find MC to be much more straightforward. It would be helpful if you could please share other external resources you found that helped you, if you don't mind :)

I just am having a hard time understanding when it's okay to make inferences.

I don't fully understand how by saying that "cable can also offer lower advertising rates than any broadcast network can, because it is subsidized by viewers through subscriber fees" means that we can infer that broadcasts are not subsidized?

We have always been taught not to make assumptions (especially in the Foundations module), so this just doesn't make sense to me.

@laurenbourg1118 agreed #feedback

I have been getting all these questions right so far (and often within the time margin), but find that I am not really able to identify minor vs. major premises and tend to ignore sub-conclusions.

I usually just look for the main conclusion within the stimulus. Is this a bad approach?

@lain.ee.bb how did you get your browser to read it out loud?