This is one break down of the 2+? = 5 example that I created for myself for these type of questions:

3+?= 6

3(evidence/premise) + ? (the missing assumption, on this case 3 aka the answer we are looking for) = 6 (the conclusion).

the missing information ? is what together with the evidence solves the conclusion.

@ognikooo omg same!!!! I almost cried lol

@char same lol!!!

its ridiculous the amount of confidence I had when I picked D on the first try lol...

dang it! I fell for A lol

@mibuch THIS!!!

just to confirm

Group 1: has the indicators (if, When, where, all, every, any, the only) it means that the sufficient indicator goes to the left side of the arrow.

Group 2: has the sets of indicators (only, Only if, only when, only where, always, must), meaning the necessary condition goes on the right side of the arrow.

am I making any sense? or do I need to re watch everything lol

@JKang omg thank you! ...same here! lol

@Jeshelto33 THANK YOU!!!

Hey, I am not averaging in the mid 160s, but I am interested (if that's okay). I live in the city.

I am not sure if I am doing this correct, but finding the conclusion, and reading the statements in the paragraphs, helped me get the right answer (because the right answer also supported the conclusion) Idk if that makes any sense or I'm just simply doing crazy at this point lol.

PS also went over the time suggested :(