@JacksonHolt I am also taking the test in June and I am feeling like I wont be able to make it to 170s by that time.

I’m genuinely confused about how and when we’re supposed to identify when to use causal chaining. I’m also unsure about the difference between causal chaining and causal mechanisms. If you build the chain incorrectly, the entire answer seems wrong, so is that really the only way to solve these questions?

Can C be the right answer just because it is irrelevant so it is not strengthening like the rest of the choices?

Im just voicing my fear to the class, making low-res summaries by myself and under timed constraints on test day is scaring me.

@NathanielWright Im taking a guess here and saying that the "why" was more so that they have "proof"of the legal transaction.

How can we always know which is the sufficient v necessary condition without indicator words?

So when the conjunction occurs within the necessary condition, like one or the other can be triggered? So, M--> O or M--> N or does it still need both to happen, but maybe not at the same time

@CharChar3 I honestly do blind review on wrong answers and the flagged ones

Hi! What does the 30 min introduction session with the tutor look like?

How can we identify what the sufficient condition and what is the necessary one?

When do students typically start hearing back from schools if they apply in October/November?

My hypothesis of why the tiger argument is stronger than the cat one is because the tiger does fulfill the mammal requirement, so almost like its chains correctly.