User Avatar
MattStickles
Joined
Nov 2025
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2026

Discussions

User Avatar
MattStickles
Friday, Feb 27

@Serafinaq I'm in the same boat, I feel like this is over complicating it and given the time on the questions this might take too long

2
User Avatar
MattStickles
Thursday, Feb 26

I got all 3 but overtime :( I think that might be the biggest challenge of converting prep to performance on this test

3
User Avatar
MattStickles
Wednesday, Feb 25

Ugh I crossed out all answers on the graphic designer question, so just decided to pick A. I got 2/3, I understand why I was wrong but man that's frustrating

1
User Avatar
MattStickles
Wednesday, Feb 25

@FultonHoover I've realized its a challenge in itself to make sure you are understanding the question you're being asked correctly, so you aren't alone! I've definitely gotten some wrong due to exactly that. Its crazy how our brains will just make connections that aren't there!

1
User Avatar
MattStickles
Edited Wednesday, Feb 25

It would be helpful to have more LSAT questions sprinkled through these lessons just like this. I know that may be coming later, but I think it could speed up understanding how the concepts apply to the test so we can focus more on drilling actual questions.

Is there a way to pull up questions by type, so we can drill ourselves on what we are currently learning?

4
PrepTests ·
PT136.S4.Q18
User Avatar
MattStickles
Saturday, Feb 21

I picked B, since high fats were most abundant in the shore areas but human brain evolution took place exclusively in savannahs. Brain being smaller would require less, so I'm still not sure how that's wrong

1
PrepTests ·
PT117.S2.Q4
User Avatar
MattStickles
Saturday, Feb 21

@brendanryankelly this would strengthen the argument, the correct answer needs to cast doubt that humans caused the birds extinction

1
User Avatar
MattStickles
Edited Wednesday, Feb 18

@jbucholz My understanding is that you are correct

If I'm assassinated, I am dead, therefore there is no possibility I can give a speech. It is necessary that I am alive

That doesn't mean that I do give the speech, I could get lost on the way to the Senate chamber and miss my time. I could get cold feet, I could get sick. In all those instances, I survived the assassination attempt, but still did not give the speech.

"You will not be hungry at bed time if you eat your dinner. Dinner is only served at 7. You cannot eat dinner unless you make it home by 7."

Your making it home by 7 doesn't mean you eat dinner, but its necessary for you to. You cannot conclude

"Home by 7-> Not hungry at bed time"

because maybe you get home by 7 but lose your appetite, maybe your allergic to whats being served, making you hungry when you go to bed. Home by 7 is necessary, but not sufficient

But you can conclude "/home by 7 -> /Not hungry at bed time" because home by 7 is necessary to eat dinner

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?