I get why C is the "most" correct but why would it be enough if it only covers one condition? and not the other -showing contempt- condition
Why not just give us the whole stimulus? It was way harder to identify which sentences were premises and conclusion this way.
The word "Research" threw me off because we're talking about initiatives!! UGH- but I see it
How is an actor that played hamlet not supposed to have a copy of Hamlet?
If you chose C, like me and can't understand why it's wrong: It's an All before Most Trap.
What was the lesson? ANCHOR YOURSELF TO THE STIMULUS!!
The support comes from only and only the stimulus, lol.
I get it, the trap is that
A -m-> B
B -m-> C
A -s- C
A: America's almonds
B: Produce from California
C: Exported to Brazil
When it should be like this instead
A -m-> B
A -m-> C
B -s- C
So
Most of America's almonds are a product of California
Most of America's almonds are exported to Brazil
Some product of California is exported to Brazil
Is this relevant for questions like: The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that...? Or is that not what this technique is for?
Hi, I live in North Jersey but also go to NYC a lot so if any girls are interested in a study group in this area let me know. I'm also open to online study sessions to hold each other accountable.
I recently started actually studying and plan on taking the lsat on April.
Hii same here, you mean online or in person? What state are you in?
This has been one of the most helpful sections for me so far. The lsat has so many unnecessarily wordy and dense sentences, so I loved this section!
Hi everyone I'm Melanie. I graduated from Villanova in 2024 with a PoliSci degree and theology minor. I'm studying to take the test next April. If anyone is interested in a study buddy I could really use one:) In live in the NJ/NYC area and go to Denver a lot so I could do study sessions in both places!
This is confusing! - The argument is that the theory is wrong, if anything wouldn't A make it more true that the theory is right?
But we're trying to strengthen the argument that the theory is wrong