- Joined
- Jun 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
Never in a million years did I think the conclusion would be
Acquire $ sacrifices health -> Should not acquire $
I thought it would be: Sacrifices health -> NOT Acquire money.
Idk if i'm just stupid, but i can't seem to get why it's the first conditional.
@c00lbeans I’m also not too entirely sure but he did mention before that the /C gets dragged out so it’ll be A ( /C -> B ) to A + /C -> B
So (A + /C) -> B
i got it right, but when I checked it over the method of how I got it right was completely wrong and so i got super confused. Might as well mark me wrong for this. I confused sufficient for necessity. idk i really don't know
SO damn confused. A says "I should've realized that it would bring significant harm to someone." In the video it was said that realizing is different from believing. So if I realized that I'm at fault, is it not the same thing as I believed I was at fault??
If I realized that I made a mistake, then can I not say that I believed I made that mistake? What am I doing wrong?
So how could I make B right?
"The NEW traffic laws applying to high-speed roadways should apply uniformly across the nation"
Is this answer just reinstating what the conclusion is saying? (So it's wrong?)
For E can you not find the contrapositive of that? it would literally just say the same thing no?
ive been getting these questions wrong and I feel like I need a break from this but I can't. This is killing me, especially this question
@amf08d334 omg i feeeeeelllll YOUU! I know its been 2 years but I'm glad at least someone is having the same feelings as I do. But to combat this, I've just been using chatgpt to generate me motivational quotes from people. It works somehow lol
Why does E say "Newspaper holdings" instead of "The Daily holdings" this tripped me up so much
Wow I was about to give up until I wrote everything down and went through the answers one by one. It took me an incredibly amount of time.