- Joined
- Dec 2025
- Subscription
- Core
UGA is 65% more likely to win the quarterfinal game against Ole Miss, UGA will almost certainly win the game and advance onto the semi finals.
I cannot make that conclusion because the likelihood=/= certainty.
Obviously... bc we lost... 💔
I was so confident, got it wrong. Then I was confident in BR, got it wrong. LOL like I hate this question
I actually suck at these, but I somehow got the last two questions right just because I turned off my brain?! Idek how to explain it.
Hi Sarah! I go to school in Athens, but I am around the Johns Creek area at times. I’d like to connect and share ideas whether that be online or in person! Sounds cool :)
Now the song is stuck in my head.
I though D was a mistaken reversal until BR where I noticed "accompanied each"... I need to slow down.
Got it right, but used a slightly different approach. I don't know if I should be worried or not.
I'm feigning for a skill builder after a billion of these bland videos. Never though I'd say that, but here we are.
It makes sense to me at first, but then when I try to apply Lawgic to explain it, I start to confuse myself lol
Hello, I am experiencing this issue as well. Is anyone from 7Sage able to help? Thank you.
I was rlly confused on why D was incorrect, so I asked Chat, IK I'm not supposed to... but it helped. Sometimes I just need to see an example of the wrong AC to understand why it does not work with question. Hope this helps someone!
ARGUMENT:
Arnot argues that making fundamental changes in government would virtually eliminate major social ills.But this conclusion is false. After all, Arnot’s argument depends on the dubious assumption that government can be trusted to act in the public interest.
What the argument would look like IF D (straw man) were correct
Why THIS is straw man
Arnot is made to say something stronger and different than what he actually argued
“All social problems will immediately disappear”
“Government will always act perfectly”
Those exaggerations do not appear in Arnot’s real argument.
The speaker attacks that exaggerated version instead.