Really hate how a majority of the questions we've done don't connect smoothly.

I find this question to be very ugly. Although I understand it, I still hate it.

I hate how much sense the correct AC is. I can't believe I fell for the wrong answer.

#feedback I really enjoy these motivational videos, please add more at the end of each (or every other) module. And although a lot of the comments did not find it as motivating to see someone who was already scoring really high improve even more, what I liked most about this video is the struggle. We can all relate to putting in so much effort and then feeling devastated when the results we want aren't there, so I really liked how in the video, Lauren, does not gloss over this. I think it's really motivating to see that everyone struggles, even those at the top, and to hear how even though it may feel impossible, with time and patience, it can be possible.

Is there a way to know the analysis on this question and questions where JY walks us through? I want to be able to see what PT this came from and the level of difficulty, because this definitely felt like a lv 3 or 4.

I understand the question and I got the answer right, but I am curious. With there being the diagram of:

wild --m--> good

domestic <--s--> good

is there a way to connect wild cats with domestic cats? I know it would not logically make sense to say some domestic cats are wild cats, but could it still be done? If so, would we use most or some?

3/5 and 4/5 on BR. The questions I got wrong were both lv. 5 questions, after watching the explanations, it makes more sense. I just need to remember the basics of diagramming when I am getting confused on the wording.

Also, if you guys can't get enough do PT 135 S4 Q23, it's a logical nightmare.

How is it that over 50% of students actually understood this logic monstrosity. It took me two sessions to understand and my head is still hurting.

The written version of this lesson is a menace for AC D

Hmm, I can think of so many controversial examples so perhaps something anodyne. Alright, let’s do Christianity. 😇 I doubt the founders of Christianity intended for the Spanish Inquisition.

Finally got one of the questions right AND under the target timing!

Just looked up Dvorak keyboards, and they look complicated to switch over. But I am curious on getting one for fun.

Honestly, I was not a fan of any of the choices. I feel like the correct AC goes against what we have been taught. No where does the stimuli talk about complexity and what makes an inferior theory. We know what makes part of a superior theory, but that does not give us enough to discuss what makes something inferior.

3/5

Diagramming

Infant --> /voluntary sound

Toddler --> voluntary sound

-----------------------------------

Motor Control --> Speech Acquisition

What's missing:

AC A: voluntary sound --> Motor Control

Got it right. But this does not feel like a lv. 1 question.

8/13. I understand why I got them wrong. It just sucks that I got basically half of them wrong. The only okay part was that the questions I got wrong were level 3 or higher.

Coming back from a month of not studying and get hit with this RC Drill.

3/7; BR: 4/7

I forgot just how much I dislike RC. Also, there is no way that this is a level 2 passage!

JY's explanation of this really helped. I was breaking my head thinking of how women's crafts weren't really studied through traditional means and wound up choosing E. But he broke it down so easily. 

Here's my explanation:

Other Critics: Negative news -> harm economy --> affect spending

Economist: confidence in me --> spending --> harms economy

A: confidence in me --> harm's economy

In the context we have, this would look like:

confidence in me

-> harm economy because of damaging people's confidence

Negative news

This would not connect the chain as we would jump from confidence in me to harm economy to negative news,

whereas D states: harm economy --> / confidence in me

In the context we have, this would add to the chain:

Negative news -> harm economy because of damaging people's confidence --> / confidence in me--> affect spending

So, the flaw is that the argument fails to consider that the media critics are right, which D proves as it connects confidence in me with negative news through chaining.

I like to think of support with the word "therefore"

Tigers are very aggressive and can cause serious injuries to people THEREFORE not every mammal is suitable to keep as a pet

This trick doesn't work with every situation, but it can be helpful for starting off to recognize the patterns.

This sounded so motivational! Thank you for this.