- Joined
- Jul 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I really think that @MichaelWright has some unique insights into these questions. I will try to remember the point about logical strength in Parallel questions.
I was confused about whether the 29% of W was out of the 38% of H in general. If that is clear, then it's easy to understand: students of H are divided into P and W, the overall night class is 38%, but W's night class 29% is way below average, so P has to be greater than average to balance it out. Under timed conditions, B is dangeous because it's narrower than A.
Picked D because I mistook the quote from the third sentence for the "fail later for lack of managerial skills" from the second sentence
prem: sig increase→new way (group 3 indicator unless)
conc: /new way ("existing ways")→/sig increase ("not increase... to any appreciable degree")
@reneevul I expected the same exact thing from the reading: maybe the originial ideal was to have the most modern organ available, that's why I chose D, but I guess "modified" can be anything, had it said "modernized" they would definitely make D very strong.
I didn't like C because of the "minutes before" but BDE didn't occur "because of a city sidewalk in need of repair or maintenance" and A satisfies the "should be liable" principal.
My understanding is that D is correct because it's the only answer choice that only comments on the company as a whole and doesn't make any distinction between accountants and actuaries. But I would probably still mistakenly choose C if I were to do this question again.
I'm a little confused about the most arrow, should it be -m-> or m above the arrow? Or is it completely personal preference?
@Kevin_Lin This is very helpful: differenciating "can't" as part of the modifier versus "can't" as the main verb.
"defects in it were so obvious that pointing them out benefited no one." is the speaker's opinion, not Jarrett's. We don't know if Jarrett's hope and expectation is and ac A gives us that. Also, De Morgan's law turns "and" to "or" so we don't need to worry about the "seriously harm" part, we only need to satisfy one of the two conditions to achieve "shouldd not criticize"