Lord, how did the author write this kind of crazy sentence "Taking the explication of experience as its object as well as its method". When I translated it to my mother tongue, this crazy shit even looks more ambivalent and complacted.
When facing A, I just thought "how can a 19th question's right answer so direct and clear to the stimulus, there must be something else to be considered ". And I chose the wrong one
The evil way to create a 1-level question is writing a long-winded stimulus and put the right answer in E.
as a level 5 question it is not among the hardest ones. But putting a level 5 in 10th question is bad.
I really want to know the feelings of guys who took this PT in the real LSAT test day. Many of them must said "WTF" after reading this crazy shit.
Bruh, but third paragraph says "A few centuries later, this latter system was to display the first use of numerals". Given this how can we eliminate A(it was not capable of representing quantity)?
Is that the famous Rhesus Monkeys experiment? Every time I saw the image of that "surrogate mother" would trigger me a uncanny valley effect. The researchers really maden the appearence of surrogate mothers horrific.
As a kid who spent his childhood in the village among mountains(like stardew valley if you have played that), this passage is nostalgic. Every chicken or hen(even with kids) will peck each other until they get the status. Some people call it pecking order.
every time I see something like Essayist, I know things will be fXXked up
After a period of learning LSAT, I recognize that I can do better in LEVEL4 or 5 questions. While to level 1-2-3 questions in a section, I will lose some points for some stupid reasons.
This is especially common in LR sections.
@AshleyThomas Sorry for just seeing this now. That is great! Could you please tell me the platform or app that you prefer to communicate so that we can link up. If 7sage delete your messages of the information, I will DM you asap. I am open to virtual and in-person both!
This is such a relief when seeing great improve in RC after using low-resolution summary.
Some jargons, even translated to my mother tongue, still sound like words invented by aliens
RC, the part I hate most. Comparing RC with LR makes taking LR drills like an enjoyment. Hope I can do well in the next year test.
@CamilleChmura Me too, after doing more drills and PTs, my emotions are just like swinging pendulum. Sometimes really nice, sometimes really bad
They said 'could', I take this as a hint to regard the conclusion is hypothetical so that we can exclude the wrong one.
TBH, considering and solving this 'level 5 ' question is like enjoying something, after seeing the intelligent allien bullshit question. If you are studying the core curriculum, you will get me.
When doing this question, I am having hiccup. This makes me a little bit nervous.
English is not my mother tongue and reading all these terminologies is such a torture. IDK what you guys' feelings when looking at all these chloxxxxxyte and nuclexxxph things.
Pat, I am Spongebob. Go back to the rock and plz do not show up in a LSAT test.
Perhaps my hippocampus is malfunctioning. Every time I wanted to remember something in a RC question, I have no short-term memory so I have to go back to the phrase to double check again.
It is not a hard one. But why put this RC shit in LR?
I will not say it is one of the hardest questions. But I do hope I will never meet this one in the test day.
I hope one day the test of would-be M.Ds can have a 4-level RC passage including infomation of JDs in ancient Greece and Rome.