After a period of learning LSAT, I recognize that I can do better in LEVEL4 or 5 questions. While to level 1-2-3 questions in a section, I will lose some points for some stupid reasons.
This is especially common in LR sections.
English is not my mother tongue and reading all these terminologies is such a torture. IDK what you guys' feelings when looking at all these chloxxxxxyte and nuclexxxph things.
Pat, I am Spongebob. Go back to the rock and plz do not show up in a LSAT test.
every time I see something like Essayist, I know things will be fXXked up
Perhaps my hippocampus is malfunctioning. Every time I wanted to remember something in a RC question, I have no short-term memory so I have to go back to the phrase to double check again.
After a period of learning LSAT, I recognize that I can do better in LEVEL4 or 5 questions. While to level 1-2-3 questions in a section, I will lose some points for some stupid reasons.
This is especially common in LR sections.
Is that the famous Rhesus Monkeys experiment? Every time I saw the image of that "surrogate mother" would trigger me a uncanny valley effect. The researchers really maden the appearence of surrogate mothers horrific.
This is such a relief when seeing great improve in RC after using low-resolution summary.
It is not a hard one. But why put this RC shit in LR?
Some jargons, even translated to my mother tongue, still sound like words invented by aliens
RC, the part I hate most. Comparing RC with LR makes taking LR drills like an enjoyment. Hope I can do well in the next year test.
I will not say it is one of the hardest questions. But I do hope I will never meet this one in the test day.
I need to take a snack to take a short break from LSAT prep, maybe popcorn.
Inaccurate indicators? It seems too strong and untenable. Why not just say 'some rules of Nobel Prize should be changed'?
They said 'could', I take this as a hint to regard the conclusion is hypothetical so that we can exclude the wrong one.
I suppose the only purpose for LSAC to create this kind of long-winded question is delaying students' time in the LSAT test.
Option C reminds me the first class in econometrics: Correlation does not mean causality
TBH, considering and solving this 'level 5 ' question is like enjoying something, after seeing the intelligent allien bullshit question. If you are studying the core curriculum, you will get me.
As a kid who spent his childhood in the village among mountains(like stardew valley if you have played that), this passage is nostalgic. Every chicken or hen(even with kids) will peck each other until they get the status. Some people call it pecking order.
When doing this question, I am having hiccup. This makes me a little bit nervous.
love this teaching way