I can't believe the target time of this question is 41 seconds...

A: not everything ≠ nothing

it's really tough for me to consider the presence of alternative without any hint in the stimulus, even though i know a is not good

i prefer graph

My experience of Tarot makes me better understand D, which is kind of like hypnosis. I asked what's the career future of me as an associate before and got a emperor. After that, I really get struggled for a period, however, I feel that's just the nourishment to become "lawyer emperor" now when I recall it.

The subjects of the other half was told, hey, you watched movie rather than musice, then they imagined how the movie is by themselves when they were asked to recalled.

I was told, hey, you were on the way to become better, then I imagine how my experience piece serve my ambition.

I think prefer≠can't detect the difference. e.g. I prefer diet coke, I still can tell difference between it and zero coke/general coke.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa wealthy subjects, plz read more carefully

my first full correction... thank god... i almost lost my faith in lsat

I don't agree with the explanation that B is flawed because everytime is 50%. That's your common sense, but we use lawgic in Lsat, like we'll meet the assumption saying cats are fish.

I agree B is wrong just because the likelyhood is not same. However, the stimulus also talks a lot that the station has never changed. We don't know if there's something changed in D, and that's why I discarded it. So I'm a little confused, when we need a perfect answer, and when we just need an almost nessary answer.

老美你何意味啊。。。。。

I should have been more careful... but it's harder when it's close to ending, my brain was already overburnt

@Omiliay. Sorry to bother you, but you mean if they're caused by volcanoes, they're just craters, rather than MC?

This mistake makes me feel like an idiot. I was exercised to think in a more complicated way, but this is a pupil's question

what do you meannn bru

@Kevin_Lin I've already figured it out, but I met a series of such explanations on that day, which really annoyed me

do i really need a jd?

#feedback I really hope 7sage revise their explanation for wrong answers, rather that just saying it doesn't involve/mention/match, at least explain for why briefly.

I'm with you too. But after reading passage 3 again, I figured it out.

"most astronomers dismissed her interpretation", and "some sought...outer..."

If without the things after "and", it's entirely ill founded, but those "some" thought her foundation make a little sense, in the wrong way though. So D matches this structure more.

About E, most of them dismissed her interpretation, so they couldn't think her interpretation was correct.

@beyondsudi482 I'm totally with you after 8 years

@bernalc8542486 as a non-native English speaker, i was totally cooked by this

Challenge. I chose D because I think both D and E are wrong, but E is worse. You didn't control all of it; at least some of the other parts in this comparison. For example, what if the country that continues to imprison debtors is the United States, and the country that has ceased to do so is a poor and underdeveloped country in Africa? The example is extreme, but you guys can get me

@puddingeveryday thank you very much! I feel much clearer after a few days, especially with your explanations. sometimes I would be stuck when I overthink

bro, i thought you want me to find puns...

@TG55 Hola hola! I speak Chinese, but I have website translation ;)

@TG55 oh~~i've never known that! I do notice some of my native friends don't care grammar too much though. Thank you for your encouragement and i feel better after knowing that! Have a nice day!