#feedback 6 & 7 were understandable after reading the explanation. If could we get a video on when the indicators are on single clauses ( question section 6) & what we should be evaluating on a comparison within conditional logic ( question section 7) then that would been helpful to see if I am grasping what I should know by now.

Many helpful videos for them individually. For this exercise I was unsure if I was supposed to do more with these embedded comparison clauses & I was unsure on how to change a singular clause into a conditional logic ( if there’s an existing video can someone drop the name)

After 30 sec , I can tell this is going to cost time & I wanted to skip. The great things about this being practice is since MOMMA DIDN’T RAISE A PUNK, I had to buckle down and actually do the question. Took 5 minutes but I confidently selected the right answer.

This is the FIRST time on my entire 7sage journey where, when I narrowed it down, the correct answer was already eliminated ….. rough

I didn't know promote was causal language ganggg wya

I thought A because I was considering that the excerpt was a sub-conclusion / major premises for the main conclusion ….

First question I’ve ever gotten correct in under target time. LETTSS GOOOOO!!

Let me know if I’m wrong. The reason strong claims like “guarantee” doesn’t work for correct answer choices on NA is because when it is negated ‘does not guarantee’ leaves a big range on the scale of guarantee (never guarantees - sometimes guarantees) and those types of claim will ALWAYS fail the negate test. ?? Anyone else think of it like this ?

I really would have nailed this if it was a weakening question.

Does anyone else feel like they kicked up most of the answer choices phrases to the domain. The same 3 phrases kept getting repeated ( A E D ). I was like I must be missing a grammar thing and binggoooo

Reading this days after the UH CEO passing is gold