@ Same. Think I dropped a few points in the RC section though. How many do you think you missed on LG? Think I for sure dropped at least 3-4.

@ said:

I may be an outlier but I found the rest of the test almost "easy". Possibly one of the easiest RCs we've had in years and the LR sections were easy - moderate at best. So my guess is that most people will pick up a handful of points in those three sections that will likely offset the awful LG section a bit. I definitely think my score will suffer nonetheless but maybe we are overreacting slightly? I'm really just keeping my fingers crossed and hoping I did very well on RC and LR.

@ I feel the same way, although I did find the 26 LR section to have a few difficult questions tbh. Do you think you broke 170?

@ said:

Hanging in until I see that score. Do a few LSAT problems here and there to stay fresh but not expecting to need a retake at this time.

@ Do you think you broke 170 despite that LR section?

@ said:

Both real LR had 26 questions. One of the had a question involving financial fraud by employees at a company. The other had a question about squids, a question about planets (something about Jupiter)

Real RC was jazz, cycling, volcanoes, intellectual property.

Games was employees giving tours of Venezuela and Uruguay over Jan, Feb, March.

Didn't the real RC have ice glaciers / ice drilling?

@ said:

I had three LR sections. Two of them had 26 questions and one of them had 25. Please tell me the 25 question one counted?

No I think the 25 LR is experimental

@ said:

The real RC: was about jazz, volcanoes, cycling/camping, and intellectual property

The real LG: contained a game about tour guides for two South American countries and a game about shelving

@ I don't remember cycling. I remember Ice Core drilling instead.

@ said:

@ honestly it was all a blur. my second LR had an armoured (turtle?) question. My third one had one about med students and dosages I believe

@ did you have LR (26) - LG -LR (25) - LR (26) - RC?

@ said:

Real LG: soup and countries! why: I had three LR. I found the first to be LR to be SO HARD. I definitely bombed it so fingers crossed its experimental

@ did your first LR have as a question apricots?

@ said:

I only had 2 LR. I remember a question about rodents, democracy and literacy, milk and antibiotics.

@ do you remember a question about cheeseburgers?

@ said:

I think the rodent one is the real one (26) questions!

Can you share your section order and which LR section you had your rodent one in?

@ said:

@ said:

I also had LR, LG, LR, LR, RC. RC felt like the easiest of the three. For whatever reason the first game in the LG initially stumped me (can’t remember what it was about), the last game also felt really difficult.

Did you find the first LR really difficult? and do you remember the 2nd LR having a question about rodents? (if I remember correctly. I really hope the first LR is the experimental one

How many LR questions did you have per section @ @

@ said:

I had LR, LG, LR, LR, RC

How many questions per LR?

Hi 7Sagers! Can anyone who had RC experimental or LG experimental comment with the topics (no answers)? I noticed no one has talked about this yet

So is C for #26 wrong bc we don’t actually know if the water department has been over enforcing? I straight up misread the question stem and thought it contained the qualification “if true”

#help

i don’t actually think D is descriptively accurate like JY says.

Copy and pasted from another 7sage user:

“D” starts from “concludes that Riley’s claim is false…” But we are told only that “we should not conclude solely on the basis…” In other words we should not trust her judgement. It looks to me different from claiming that Riley’s claim is false.

Thoughts? #help

@ is there an option to stop the timer? That’d be really helpful

Hello! Did anyone here NOT have the question about ozone emissions (organic compounds); it was a resolve reconcile question. Please let me know!

D just states that the stipend EXCEEDS the cost of tuition. By how much? Who knows. Maybe by a LOT. Doesn't this allow for us to potentially infer that maybe the stipend DOES match/exceed the cost of EDUCATION?

#help

25: If you picked A like me, I think you were tricked for one reason in particular:

(1) Dostoyevsky did dabble in fantasy (lines 14-15) but fantasy doesn't necessarily mean art that "stood high above the present and the everyday". If you conflated those two terms then yeah A was tricky.

(2) Even if you conflated those two terms, I still think that should be overridden by the fact that line 10 says "AS A REALIST..."; the first line says these two viewpoints were opposing in direction, so if Dostoyevsky lines himself up more so with the second view, then A can't be right.

I chose D but had to do a double take on A because I focused too much on the word "rare." I assumed that if Nahcolite is rare, it isn't forming anymore. I then wrongly inferred that if Nahcolite isn't forming anymore, then the there's not at least 1,125 parts of CO2.. therefore the level of CO2 must be lower these days than it was in Eocene. (Mistaken Negation of Sufficiency)

The stimulus tells us

Nahcolite formed → at least 1,125 parts of CO2

NOT

1,125 parts of Co2 → Nahcolite

So even if our atmosphere has 1,125 parts of CO2, it doesn't mean Nahcolite will form.

Can someone kindly verify?

#help

@ said:

Hi everyone,

On Wednesday, April 10 at 9 p.m. ET, I’ll host a webinar with our newest consultant Elizabeth Cavallari, a former admissions officer at William & Mary Law School, and our own Selene Steelman, a former director of admissions at Cardozo Law.

I’ll ask them about life on the other side of the admissions desk, including questions like this:

How do you review files? How do you come to a decision?

How do you make decisions about splitters or reverse splitters?

Are nontraditional applicants at an advantage or disadvantage?

Are international applicants at an advantage or disadvantage?

Do ED applicants get a boost?

How much should students read into status checkers?

Tell me more about the waitlist. How and when do you review files?

Is there a right and a wrong time to send a LOCI?

What do admissions officers do when they’re not reading files?

What’s the best and the worst part of the job?

Any big-picture dos and don’ts for applicants?

You’ll get a chance to ask your questions at the end.

:warning: You’ll have to register for this webinar in advance.

:cookie: After the webinar, we’ll award one attendee a free Edit Once (see https://classic.7sage.com/admissions/enroll).

→ Please register for the webinar here: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/8181831f40e47792cde7dc3c8da9331e

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.

Zoom might prompt you to download something before you can join the webinar, so I’d advise you to show up a bit early.

I hope to see you there!

Is the financial aid Application Package submission over? I was getting ready to submit it tonight...

This question went unanswered so I'm hoping to get a response...

#help

"The part about the credited response, "D", that I disagree with is that it says the two quoted studies had some flaws that prevent us from forming "conclusions regarding a causal relationship" ; however, the stimulus never said the two studies concluded there was no causal relationship; the two studies just said there were no correlations; not no causations. Because of that I did not like "D" and liked "E" more even though "E" uses the word several that, as discussed previously above, is weak. "E" also does not provide any attacks on the causal relationship - did night lights cause myopia? However, "E" does not say anything that contradicts with what happened in the passage whereas "D" seems to say the two studies made a causal conclusion when the two studies only made a correlation- based conclusion. Also, although the argument does not commit to the fact that there is no relationship ; rather it assumes if such a relationship does exist (night light causes myopia) then it is an effect that dissipates with age

Were we suppose to assume the the two studies when they said no correlation implies a no causation conclusion?"

#help Isn’t the author implicitly stating that distant relatives SHOULD not have greater claim to your estate than would your beloved friend? That’s why I picked E

@ said:

I went ahead and signed up for November just because I have the free take from my July Cancel. But I’m focused on polishing my personal and diversity statement. I’m pretty much on my final draft for my PS and still need to have clean up my DS a tiny bit. I’ve also started doing research specifically for why x essays. It’s more work than I expected. Letters of rec have been done for a long time now so I think I’ll be able to apply in October unless September went worse than expected.

@ I'm sure you did great! I think I saw somewhere on another forum that you think you broke 170 for Sept?

Answer choice C is wrong because that’s not Max’s conclusion