- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
Two pieces of feedback on the study plan feature:
1. More control over individual tasks: I completed an LR section but the system didn't register it as done. It would be helpful to have the ability to manually check off a task when the system misses it. Along the same lines, it would be great to be able to skip specific tasks entirely. For example, I have a limited number of LR sections remaining and would prefer not to use them up on assigned tasks, or to be able to use sections that aren't 100% fresh (some of mine are 80-90% fresh).
2. Section targeting: It would be useful to adjust individual study blocks to target a specific section type more heavily. RC is my bigger weakness, so being able to shift the balance away from LR and toward RC within the plan would make it much more effective for me!
(C) weakens the argument because the argument is saying “dioxin is unlikely to be the cause” but if (C) is true, the dioxin is only near the fish for a brief period before going further downstream, which is why their hormone levels go back to normal so quickly. So dioxin IS the cause of the hormone concentrations
this actually hurt my brain because i kept having to refer back to the text
"Thus, even well-intentioned attempts to resolve the marital problems of friends are usually unjustified." This is not the main conclusion, it's an additional premise. It's basically saying intention doesn't matter, and while that is supported, that doesn't contribute to whether an action is justified, which is what we're looking for.
@J.Y.Ping for some reason, i can only see the notifications badge but not the actual chat. is there anything i can do to fix that?
"Amateur scientists have also provided many significant contributions...amateur scientists are motivated by the love of discovery alone."
Therefore, it follows that the love of discovery is the motive behind many significant contributions to science.
Note the word "proof" in "[Aeschylean] drama is proof of the emergence within ancient Greek civilization of the individual as a free agent.", not that it is the emergence itself.
(A) is correct because it explains the finding fully. The moose ate some of the bird food in the park, so some bird species exist in higher numbers outside of the park where there are less moose. The rest of the ACs don't EXPLAIN the researchers' finding, and you just have to be extremely critical when reviewing the answers.
(B) says there are also some reptiles outside. Okay? So what?
(C) says some of the tagged birds were recaptured outside the park. That doesn't explain anything.
(D) says there is waterside growth both inside and outside the park that birds thrive on. This explains nothing.
(E) says there are endangered species both inside AND outside the park. This also explains nothing.