- Joined
- Mar 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I feel like I am not doing well on the NA questions because I am trying to find the sufficient assumption in the stimulus and I cannot find it. Can someone help please!
In the first rule, why would justified be the sufficient condition? The word "if" is a sufficient condition indicator. I know that you cannot go off of the indicator words only, but it made sense to do so in this problem. I drew out that the computer used in a business was the sufficient condition and that it was justified without the authorization as the necessary. So it was like this: used in business-> justified w/o authorization.
I really struggle with conditional logic and do not know what to do. I am not sure if I should go back and relearn it or if I should just continue with the lesson plan. I fell behind with my study plan because of finals...
what is the difference between a premise and context? what would be the best way to identify the two?
I was hesitant to choose C because the phrase "well above" made me feel like it as too far of a reach based on what was said in the passage. The stimuli just said that the temp would have to AT LEAST be 350. So, I rationalized not picking C because 355 could be the maximum and it isn't necessarily "well above" 350. I got it correct in the BR but that's because I had chosen that as a back up. If anyone could explain this to me I would appreciate it! #help #feedback