I feel like I am not doing well on the NA questions because I am trying to find the sufficient assumption in the stimulus and I cannot find it. Can someone help please!

In the first rule, why would justified be the sufficient condition? The word "if" is a sufficient condition indicator. I know that you cannot go off of the indicator words only, but it made sense to do so in this problem. I drew out that the computer used in a business was the sufficient condition and that it was justified without the authorization as the necessary. So it was like this: used in business-> justified w/o authorization.

I really struggle with conditional logic and do not know what to do. I am not sure if I should go back and relearn it or if I should just continue with the lesson plan. I fell behind with my study plan because of finals...

this tripped me up

what is the difference between a premise and context? what would be the best way to identify the two?

Does including the indicator word matter? On question 4 it was not included, but on question 5 it was?