- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
i ruled out D because the AC says that the shells werent found "near" antartica, so i didnt see the relevance for something "bear" antartica, when the bubbles were found "in" antartica....
@DominiqueMarie what i'm worried is that, I want to get into the Fall 2026 entry, and if i do a retake, I am afraid i wont get my score in time for the uni's to review and send an offer :/
Hey y'all, I finished sitting my LSAT today, I think I did well, but I found that time was taken away from me because the proctor was speaking loudly inside the testing room.
The official time to begin was 8am, but we were allowed a staggered start, so those who came in at 7.30am were allowed to start at 7.30am, and I believe someone people were allowed to come in later too after 8am. So there was people coming in during the time I was completing the first two sections. The proctor was bringing people into the room and talking to them in her normal speaking voice (not whispering) and providing instructions. I could hear her through my noise cancelling earmuffs provided by the centre.
I had to re-read a few stims 2 or 3 times because her speaking loudly interfered with my thinking process, so I lost time that way. I still managed to finish and complete all the questions, but I dont think she should have been talking loudly like that at all - also the staggered entry was weird too, is that how its normally done at testing centres? During the 10 min break, I went to the ladies at reception and asked them to advice the proctor to use her inside voice or whisper, and they said she will. But she was just as loud and interruptive for the last 3 sections as she was for the first two.
If all of the above is normal of testing centres I would have just taken the test at home.
i got this wrong because i was so focused on treating this question as a principle question.
If the correct answer choice was worded differently, I would have definitely gotten this answer correct. I understood what the flaw was but did not see the flaw translate over into AC C.
i got this question wrong the first time round, but doing it again, I got it right. this time round i thought, just because the cup dates back to 2000 bc doesnt mean the content in the cup is also from then. is that an accurate line of thinking?
@RadicalReindeer questions you spend too much time on get marked for blind review
I thought the whole idea was about expressing "deep emotion" not just any emotion...
Sorry, how is A right when the stim says that the amount of grapefruit juice is "prescribed"... so if a patient is prescribed to take 5ml of juice then that's all they will have to take... so how can the "chemical be unpredictable glass to glass" when the amount of the grapefruit juice is "prescribed"
The reason I didn't choose D is not because of the some, all, most confusion but because D talk about the history of the paintings whereas in the stim the instructor does not talk about the history of the paintings. The instructor merely mentions where the paintings came from and here we are supposed to deduce that that means history?
I dont understand how D is correct. "in recent years" implies that they did frequently do this previously, but theres no indication of this being done if ever at all.
I cancelled out D because the stim talked about "damage" to self esteem, not "loss" of it.....
Why is temperature being assumed to be "hot" here? Why can't it be col?
@sevinnamin188 after reading the stim, i found it odd that the likelihood of tropical storms was never mentioned again in the stim so I thought that the right answer choice must include something about tropical storms, so I cancelled everything out except A and B - and comparing A and B, A seemed to follow from what the stim said. B was too restrictive...... so that's the way i did it and got the answer right but not sure if this is a reliable method or a fluke. Feedback would be great :)
I ruled out D from the get-go because i though inaccurate is a milder form of incorrect. incorrect sounded too strong but the question asked to focus on the logical structure
I ruled out A because I wasn't sure what "it" in the AC was referring to in the stimulus, to me it seemed like it was referring to anything
#confused because thought in C the TV show host concedes by saying "even if there is a decline"