24 secs under, lets gooooooooooo

(1) make a low-resolution summary

one type of rock loacted on earth supports the 3rd hypothesis of late bombardment and that rock came from mars

(2) identify different perspectives and the author’s attitude.

authour says that in order for this evidence to be solid they have to find more such rocks and samples from other planets.

(1) make a low-resolution summary

diff theories trying to explain the evidence from the moon samples and size of craters.

(2) identify different perspectives and the author’s attitude

sci 1 - LHB result of big asteroid désintégration

sci 2 - disagree and say latter impacts obliterated evidence of earlier impacts

sci 3 - brief duration and existed between earth and moon

(3) predict the direction of the next paragraph.

offer authors own opinion

(1) predict the Passage Style

Debate/critique

(2) make a low-resolution summary

big debate around planet history based on lunar rocks. LHB on moon 4billion yrs ago. LHB shrapnels couldve affected earth.

(3) identify different perspectives and the author’s attitude

Here the authors perspective that shrapnel from LHB could have affected earth

(4) predict the direction of the next paragraph.

based on the way this passage ends i think the author is going to talk about how actually the shrapnels did not affect earth and provide a hypothesis on why they think that

3 min overtime because my fiance decided to take a call and speak very loudly >:(

The technique taught by Kevin reminds me of this bottle challenge game that was viral a few months ago LOL (the technique being like the person who starts collecting from the farthest bottle):

i got this question wrong the first time round, but doing it again, I got it right. this time round i thought, just because the cup dates back to 2000 bc doesnt mean the content in the cup is also from then. is that an accurate line of thinking?

I thought the whole idea was about expressing "deep emotion" not just any emotion...

Sorry, how is A right when the stim says that the amount of grapefruit juice is "prescribed"... so if a patient is prescribed to take 5ml of juice then that's all they will have to take... so how can the "chemical be unpredictable glass to glass" when the amount of the grapefruit juice is "prescribed"

The reason I didn't choose D is not because of the some, all, most confusion but because D talk about the history of the paintings whereas in the stim the instructor does not talk about the history of the paintings. The instructor merely mentions where the paintings came from and here we are supposed to deduce that that means history?

I dont understand how D is correct. "in recent years" implies that they did frequently do this previously, but theres no indication of this being done if ever at all.

I cancelled out D because the stim talked about "damage" to self esteem, not "loss" of it.....

Why is temperature being assumed to be "hot" here? Why can't it be col?

I ruled out D from the get-go because i though inaccurate is a milder form of incorrect. incorrect sounded too strong but the question asked to focus on the logical structure

I ruled out A because I wasn't sure what "it" in the AC was referring to in the stimulus, to me it seemed like it was referring to anything

I thought in LSAT "or" meant "And" :((((((((

Urgh this AC equivocated itself!!

#tutorfeedback

I understood the stim to say " our museum only displayed 20th century works, and these 20th century works that which display are either here on loan or its from our permanent collection. So because they said they only display 20th century works, I thought that meant this museum only displayed 20th century works, and then it said that it only sold the prints form the permanent collection so because all the permanent collection are from the 20th century I thought this was furthering strengthening my idea of the right answer, but now I am realizing the stim also says the store also sold some other prints and I mistakenly assumed the "other" prints meant the prints on loan because the first part of the stim says the museum ONLY displayed X or Y….. If I didn’t mistakenly assume that, I would have gotten this answer correct. Just because the store sells other work doesn’t mean that work is the loaned stuff. So that means the work isn't 20th century.

Is my reasoning correct? this is what i diagrammed:

guys... omg... I could cry!!! I was struggling with SA for the longest time, so I hopped on the SA live class last night with Clayton and realized what I have been doing wrong. this is the FIRST TIME EVER i got a 5 star SA question correct.

Can someone explain to me how this answer choice doesn't just go against a premise?

I didn't pick D because I thought it went against the conditional arrow and I still see it that way after hearing the explanation - please help :(

#pleasehelp after reading the stimulus, i knew that the right answer had to be something along the lines of "maybe they reduced red meat intake at home and so eat steak at restaurants now as a treat", and E seemed to align with that thought BUT the "patronize" part ruled it out for me because no one said anything about anyone "putting down" and "patronizing" the steak restaurants UGH

can we understand the conclusion to be the necessary?

how do i get faster at this

this method is magical