The stimulus never states that all abstract paintings are a part of the art movement. It says that the only ones without the 2 qualities within the art movement are abstract.

So, because it's not clear that being abstract is sufficient for membership in the movement, why is it necessary that Blue Irises is not not abstract?

Could it not be true that Blue Irises is abstract but it isn't a member for some other reason that we don't know about?

Its not even clear that failing your guarantee is possible. And the relationship is that most large nurseries have the guarantee. This means that as few as half+1 of the large nurseries are doing the guarantee. I don't see how a disease-carrying shipment means that the guarantee probably failed when it seems more likely that this was one of the instances of a large nursery without the guarantee.

The stimulus never states that FMRIs aren't labeled. It feels like we've made an assumption there that our correct answer B hinges on. Can somebody explain how we can be sure of this?

would we ever be tested on "its not the case that many" New Yorkers ride the train?

Feels like this is where the difference between some and many comes into play.

In question 3, is it okay for me to kick up both tall palms and main stem to the domain?

My answer is developed→terminal.

I feel like this is incorrect but I cannot quite understand why. We are discussing the main stem and how to identify which bud is developed.

This question requires you to forsake everything you know about the deer population as well as the wolf population. A is so ridiculous it seems incorrect

If the scientists are "tempted," I don't understand how we can infer that they are going to make an attempt. It seems reasonable, but its always tough to know which assumptions we are allowed to make.

Main point questions are a handout on LR but they're my most missed question on RC haha

This was a banger video

Dang. C got me because I wasn't ready to replace the word "rely" with the word "invest."

My internal dialogue was "what if they're investing in computer technology companies without implementing any of those companies' tech?"

Always tough when it seems like no answers are right.

21 is tricky. AC E It got me because when reading "former" and "latter," I was thinking about the passage of time rather than the order in which the two kinds of sculptures were mentioned. You have to read so carefully on these ACs.

This was a fire explanation

Dang this was an easy question I threw myself off because I got so wrapped up in trying to figure out whether or not the blood freezes. Gotta pay more attention to the stem.

Hate this question. Stuck between A and C during the test and chose C because it feels like it does more for the fortuitous accident component of the conclusion. But neither A nor C make this even somewhat believable.