@JacobBaska thank you!

@JacobBaska hi! What is your advice if you're >10 years out of undergrad and operating in senior leadership roles already? I have community based leadership programs I am in -- of which I can get a LoR, I also have a best friend from college who has gone on to be an attorney and can speak to my character/study habits/fitness for law. I have maybe one professor I keep in touch with and one former manager I could ask, but the ask would be out of left field.

@xzhang22 ty!! v helpful!

@ckilk tysm!!

I read this question as what best expresses the reasoning behind the author's argument. As in, why did the author believe in her argument that criticism of Handel's da capo arias is invalid. In which case, I thought B would be the explanation.

How can I correct this mental model? does "reasoning" always mean "argument/conclusion?" in questions like these?

how is "some parrots are not clever" which was cited as an incorrect interpretation of the negated, "Some parrots ARE clever," different from "all parrots are not clever." Wouldn't "all parrots are not clever" include the "some"?

@Laylay i thought necessary condition was always in the right?

this f'd me up

can someone explain how this is not correct?

Identify A & B

• A: Some cultivars of corn

• B: Most cultivars of corn

What we're comparing them on:

• morphological closeness to sorghum

Identify the winner

• some cultivars of corn

I know I'm not thinking about it correctly, but I also cannot find the rationale that adjusts my logic here.

so in #2 -- I think there was a conclusion but it seems like it was someone else's conclusion. So that means the author did not assert their own conclusion and instead reported someone else's conclusion..and so there is no conclusion...?