Subscription pricing
Hey guys! I wanted to the gauge the vibes for the upcoming LSAT? How is everyone feeling? My anxiety is killing me.
PT Questions
dinamishak99
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
dinamishak99
Friday, Aug 08 2025
You can take it up to a year after your test. But you have to take it to get your score back
dinamishak99
Wednesday, Dec 25 2024
so when we're making inferences, wouldn't answer C work?
dinamishak99
Tuesday, Dec 17 2024
yea cuz i use the word semantic in my everyday language and should know what that means. "MY DAY HAS been quite semantic"
dinamishak99
Tuesday, Dec 17 2024
i got this right because of process of elimination, but why do we assume that info delivered too quickly means that there is too much info. aren't these two different arguments?
dinamishak99
Tuesday, Dec 17 2024
for my sanity, we're gonna pretend this question doesn't exist
dinamishak99
Tuesday, Oct 01 2024
I like when I get questions right. But then, I feel like I deserve a 30 min break as a reward. It's a win-lose situation.
dinamishak99
Monday, Aug 26 2024
for 16, making copyright law more restrictive sounds so...wrong?
dinamishak99
Sunday, Aug 25 2024
I'm not gonna lie Kevin, the beginning of this video made me chuckle.
dinamishak99
Thursday, Aug 08 2024
feels like the ACT all over again
dinamishak99
Thursday, Aug 08 2024
i think they thought the parallel questions were too easy and got bored eye roll
dinamishak99
Wednesday, Aug 07 2024
dont label these questions as super hard; it increases my ego 😏
dinamishak99
Wednesday, Aug 07 2024
JY is right. It was so easy to get focused on why the argument didn't make sense that I stopped for a second to figure it out. But i realized i was wasting time
dinamishak99
Wednesday, Aug 07 2024
don't do this to me---IM GETTING TOO CONFIDENNT!
dinamishak99
Tuesday, Aug 06 2024
I may not be right, but I think you're forgetting that the future part only exists in the correct answer. Without that, technically, the argument still stands that Sigerson's argument should be rejected on the basis that he did those same things before. We don't know the technicalities of Sigerson's argument; whether it will punish those who did it in the past, present, or future, etc. It is only through answer choice E that we figure out that Sigerson's plan is forward-facing. Therefore, D can be a correct answer if E doesn't exist. They just can't exist simultaneously.
dinamishak99
Monday, Aug 05 2024
labeling this as a one-star difficulty hurt my teeny weeny feelings
dinamishak99
Monday, Aug 05 2024
i dont like reading about friends whilst lsat studying.
dinamishak99
Monday, Aug 05 2024
C is wrong, because its existence doesn't make the argument false. It is sufficiency-necessity confusion. The counselor only argues that harsh criticism is necessary for a motive, and a motive is necessary for change. They never argue that people with motive WILL change. Yet, C says that the counselor is taking for granted motivated people will change, and the counselor never says they WILL, they just say it is necessary for it to happen.
dinamishak99
Monday, Aug 05 2024
time to push the LSAT date down
dinamishak99
Sunday, Aug 04 2024
i kept scrolling down so A could finish its sentence. it never did
dinamishak99
Sunday, Aug 04 2024
i think i got a little too cocky
dinamishak99
Sunday, Aug 04 2024
it feels like the calm before the storm
dinamishak99
Friday, Jul 26 2024
did i eliminate E the first second i saw it? yes. is this enough studying for today? perhaps so.
dinamishak99
Friday, Jul 26 2024
felt like a breath of fresh air
You'll get it eventually after you do the writing section, just delayed