Self-study
Hey guys! I wanted to the gauge the vibes for the upcoming LSAT? How is everyone feeling? My anxiety is killing me.
dinamishak99
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
dinamishak99
Friday, Aug 8, 2025
You can take it up to a year after your test. But you have to take it to get your score back
dinamishak99
Tuesday, Dec 17, 2024
yea cuz i use the word semantic in my everyday language and should know what that means. "MY DAY HAS been quite semantic"
dinamishak99
Tuesday, Dec 17, 2024
i got this right because of process of elimination, but why do we assume that info delivered too quickly means that there is too much info. aren't these two different arguments?
dinamishak99
Tuesday, Oct 1, 2024
I like when I get questions right. But then, I feel like I deserve a 30 min break as a reward. It's a win-lose situation.
dinamishak99
Sunday, Aug 25, 2024
I'm not gonna lie Kevin, the beginning of this video made me chuckle.
dinamishak99
Thursday, Aug 8, 2024
i think they thought the parallel questions were too easy and got bored eye roll
dinamishak99
Wednesday, Aug 7, 2024
JY is right. It was so easy to get focused on why the argument didn't make sense that I stopped for a second to figure it out. But i realized i was wasting time
dinamishak99
Tuesday, Aug 6, 2024
I may not be right, but I think you're forgetting that the future part only exists in the correct answer. Without that, technically, the argument still stands that Sigerson's argument should be rejected on the basis that he did those same things before. We don't know the technicalities of Sigerson's argument; whether it will punish those who did it in the past, present, or future, etc. It is only through answer choice E that we figure out that Sigerson's plan is forward-facing. Therefore, D can be a correct answer if E doesn't exist. They just can't exist simultaneously.
dinamishak99
Monday, Aug 5, 2024
labeling this as a one-star difficulty hurt my teeny weeny feelings
dinamishak99
Monday, Aug 5, 2024
C is wrong, because its existence doesn't make the argument false. It is sufficiency-necessity confusion. The counselor only argues that harsh criticism is necessary for a motive, and a motive is necessary for change. They never argue that people with motive WILL change. Yet, C says that the counselor is taking for granted motivated people will change, and the counselor never says they WILL, they just say it is necessary for it to happen.
dinamishak99
Friday, Jul 26, 2024
did i eliminate E the first second i saw it? yes. is this enough studying for today? perhaps so.
You'll get it eventually after you do the writing section, just delayed