- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Conditional reasoning is very elegant, even though sometimes it makes me bang my head on my keyboard.
Some of these 5-star questions I miss are dumb, but this one I can respect. Tricky subject matter, but the logic itself is inarguably valid.
This Q is a good example of why I have to read ALL the answer choices, even if I've found one I think I like.
This one's actually kind of fun once I understand what's going on.
I think it's really helpful to see that J.Y.'s thought process. He broke this up into two parts: 1. Does B say A does this? and 2. Does B take issue with it?
Good luck! I'm not a non-standard age, but just wanted to say that I hope you are in my class (: I always learned so much from much older non-traditional students in undergrad, they became some of my dear friends. Your perspectives and experiences are extremely valuable, and I deeply respect your determination and fearlessness in doing something new with your life. Cheering for you!
@mhpathub Assumption: You should not do anything, like, ever that makes you sacrifice your happiness.
Show me which ones I missed on BR when I'm reviewing the test! Right now it only shows red X for those that I missed originally, and nothing about BR in the Q list at the bottom. Especially important for if I get one right then change it to wrong in BR it's still a green dot in the drill/test review, I have to leave the review and go to the drill summary to find the ones I changed to incorrect in BR. Ideally this wouldn't ever ever ever happen, but I am not the ideal test taker (trust me I know). Those are definitely Qs I need to review since I obviously don't understand them.
When you do a drill, it would be awesome if it would give me the appx LSAT score that it correlates with. Or have somewhere the conversion from raw % out of 100 to LSAT score. I know it's not exactly how it works, but it helps me get a sense of how I'm doing in LSATese.
Just some thoughts + unsolicited opinions based on my last couple weeks of studying. I <3 7sage!
I NEVER EVER EVER want to spend money on car repairs and assumed Max wouldn't either :(
I've found it useful to envision things like these as a double-arrow. Not sure if that's legit logically, but it's worked for me.
C is an assumption you could say the biologist makes, but it's not truly "required by" the argument. Whether it is or is not doesn't affect the gap between premises and conclusion.