I did not know overwhelming was a SOME statement. I got it right but I wrote it down differently. I thought the stimulus looked like this: CEO 250 → PBS then PBSgh → CEO 250. When I saw answer choice E it was similar: SO → SL then SLe → SO.

How is D correct? The history of the paintings was never mentioned in the stimulus?

Is weakening the same as flaw/descriptive weakening? And is argument part the same as method of reasoning?

I thought number 19 was a sufficient assumption question. Could someone tell me why it is a NA?

On MBT answer choices, is it right to do the contrapositive on them, or do we have to accept the answer choices as they are?

I don't understand these miscellaneous questions. What am I looking after I read the stimulus?

If you leave something unchanged you are not reducing, but aren't you also not increasing? Help is appreciated.

Hahaha! Awesome story. We aren't perfect.

So a NA prevents a valid SA from being destroyed?