I did not know overwhelming was a SOME statement. I got it right but I wrote it down differently. I thought the stimulus looked like this: CEO 250 → PBS then PBSgh → CEO 250. When I saw answer choice E it was similar: SO → SL then SLe → SO.

How is D correct? The history of the paintings was never mentioned in the stimulus?

On MBT answer choices, is it right to do the contrapositive on them, or do we have to accept the answer choices as they are?

I don't understand these miscellaneous questions. What am I looking after I read the stimulus?

If you leave something unchanged you are not reducing, but aren't you also not increasing? Help is appreciated.

#24 is asking you to strengthen the argument, the indicator in the question stem is "...most strengthens" the editorialist argument.

#32 is asking you for a pseudo sufficient assumption, the indicator in the question stem is "...principles, if valid, most helps to justify the reasoning in the argument?" it works the same way as a strengthening question, but in PSA questions it just asking for something that helps the argument in some sort of way. I hope this helps.

Is weakening the same as flaw/descriptive weakening? And is argument part the same as method of reasoning?

I thought number 19 was a sufficient assumption question. Could someone tell me why it is a NA?

So a NA prevents a valid SA from being destroyed?

Yeah. Same here.

Hahaha! Awesome story. We aren't perfect.