4/5 on hard

If I get the answer right on the first try, is it necessary to watch the video explanation? Thoughts? Opinions?

lightning round af

Chose A first then D for blind review s m h

finally got one right

WHY 3 LEVEL 5 IN A ROW

Could also be the Dramamine had no effect at all.

I don't understand how we were supposed to assume that the child intentionally caused harm. I thought we should be trying to prove intent to harm. The language did not say the intent was there; it said: "if." Maybe I am going about it wrong.

i picked B because of the real world lol not logic oh well

thought it said weaken. my bad. smh.

For answer choice B, does it support the argument in the sense that yes the A-acid reduces the microglia, which actually harms brain function regardless of the now inability for said immune cells to destroy healthy cells while attempting to get rid of the protein? Affirming the "activities" of the microglia being harmful?

Can someone explain how "some" can include "all"? I understand that "some" must mean at least 1, as if you have some of something , it is impossible to not have "some" of said thing. However, how can "some" include all? If I have a portion, or "some" of a chocolate bar, I am not saying I have the entire bar. Wouldn't you need to specify "some or all students" for example to include the assumption that it can be "all" or "20" that can read? #help