#HELP! - I selected answer choice D because of Leslie's statement, "I'll show you that you question for treasure is irrational." The phrase, "I'll show you" indicated to me that she was going to try and convince Erich that his quest was irrational and the premises in her argument supported her position. Although I understand (now) why E is the correct answer, I am still unclear as to why D is incorrect.

I agree with @. Recommend stating that you cancelled the two previous LSAT scores of 160 and 162, respectively, based on the advice of [fill in the blank]. You felt the scores did not align with your goal range of [fill in the blank] and did not reflect your potential. Maybe add something about regretting the decision but believed it to be the best decision at the time. Just a suggestion.

#Help: Are/can concessions (be) premises?

#Help: What is the purpose of concessions and why is it important to know what they are? What is the role of concessions when answering questions on the LSAT?

I agree with @. Recommend stating that you cancelled the two previous LSAT scores of 160 and 162, respectively, based on the advice of [fill in the blank]. You felt the scores did not align with your goal range of [fill in the blank] and do not reflect my potential. Maybe add something about regretting the decision but believed it to be the best decision at the time. Just a suggestion.

#HELP! Can you please explain what this means, perhaps re-word it so that the explanation is clearer?

"If the sufficient condition is failed, it yields no information about the necessary condition. The necessary condition could be true or could be false."

#HELP! If D is true (and apparently it is), How does it weaken the argument? Self-selection in the experiment aside because, for me, it doesn't help. How does D weaken the conclusion?

#HELP! Without using examples, what is the definition of a relative claim and an absolute claim?

Hi! I live in Denver and work full-time as well. Looking for a study buddy group as well. Happy to char further about schedules to see if they align enough to create a study buddy/group. As of right now, I plan on taking the LSAT in June.

#HELP! Would you please provide a simplified version of the steps to arrive at the correct answer for this question? Not only was the question difficult but the explanation was equally difficult to follow. There is no way I would take over 12 minutes to answer a question like this on the LSAT. I understand that speed comes with practice, but I don't understand how I can speed up if the explanation themselves require practice and an explanation. Unfortunately, the let's review section was not helpful.

#HELP! Please refer to the long chain conclusions. Why is A -> B and B -> C listed as possible conclusions?

#Help - What is the difference between context and a set of facts in a passage with no argument?

#HELP! Think provided under lessons to review does not work.

#HELP - Can someone please provide the PT # and section for this question? Thanks!