did anyone else thought despite the development it didn't develop into more complex ways? i thought confederacy version was still somewhat crude bc it was stated that the system was both arbitrary and picture stuff. :(

Can anyone explain why C is incorrect? Just can't get it myself #help

I understand why D is correct and C is wrong, but can't explain myself why E is wrong. Can anyone help? Got it right but honestly do not understand it 200%

#help

I liked E but didn't choose it bc it's literally a restatement of the argument. But in hindsight, I should not have selected C bc even if some reporter may have been told something and told everyone, they can still SCOOP since scoop means publishing before others... Can anyone confirm if my reasoning is on the right track? #help

Can anyone explain E please? I understand why D is right but I just can't explain myself why E is wrong

#help

#help

I just didn't think E was relevant so I was surprised to find out that so many people are confused with E (now I am too lol). I just thought why is nutritionists' statement relevant? What if even though it may not be adequate, it still is better to feed more people than let them starve? Also, what if people just don't like nutritionists and therefore completely disregard what they're saying? Someone please help me with E bc I'm SO not confident with my reasoning

#help

B was my biggest contender. Ended up getting rid of it bc the stimulus says prevents vertical mixing... so I thought this would not be an example of effect of vertical mixing since it didn't happen. Can anyone confirm my reasoning?

#help

I got rid of AC A bc it says it helps kids to be proficient at a level in the society which they live... but Q's argument is about future prospects (how these current skills will be obsolete in the future). If anyone could confirm my reasoning that would be great!! I got it right but I am still not 100% sure even after listening to JY's video

#help

This is the first Q that I acrossed over hundreds that don't even got a single comment.. is this an error on my end? I was curious of what other ppl thought of AC B and D

HELPPPPPP #help

I still honestly don't get why B is incorrect. Literally got all the hardest questions right but I just can't help myself to understand WHY B is incorrect.

Like if restricting property rights by not allowing them to do anything but weeding and such is in the best interest of these property owners... isn't that in a way making sure that their rights are being protected and is of utmost importance to the city council?

I did contemplate AC B because the reasoning in my head went like: "ok... if they already own their own lit stuff that's similar to Homer's works, they might not be interested." and I had the same reasoning for AC E. In hindsight, I think AC B and AC E could also be eliminated for additional two reasons. 1) These same reasonings could be incorrect for the same reasoning error. 2) It's a big stretch to assume that they might not be interested bc they already own similar stuff. It could go the other way around. Per say, they might be EVEN MORE interested bc they like their own stuff --> homer is similar? --> yeah we like you! we're also interested in you bc your stuff is similar.

The way I got rid of D is that athletes could also be aware of cognitive faculties and use it (not by having other intellectual occupations aka like physicists as jy mentioned) during their matches. for example many sports require intellectual team work strategies. wondering if anyone also had the same reasoning

For Q1 I chose AC C because I felt like even though author thinks this prophetic ability should be credited to their artistic innovation, he still conceded by saying "no one will deny... speculation....." Thus thought B was too strong. I'm still confused between B and C. Could anyone possibly clarify?

#help

is AC E circular reasoning? #help

#help

I did debate between B and C but I ended up choosing C over B. My reasoning was that since the conclusion indicates these adaptations evolving at different times is unsurprising, something about developing similar needs just seemed bit off. Yes, we don't want to question the premise which said whatever the difference, ... similar needs... but I still don't get how this similarity is supported when they are evolving at different times...

#help

I chose AC C bc I thought AC C would help Simpson successfully defend his position from Vandenburg. Since Vandenburg is claiming that art museum is not adhering to its purpose (bc size of the contemporary art collection), I thought incorporating that an art museum's PURPOSE need not be collect every style of every period would do.

#help

Q5 was a huge time sink for me bc I didn't properly understand the question stem. It says which statement would mots WEAKEN the position that the passage attributes to critics... so I wasn't sure if that meant the New Urbanists (since the passage is attributing) or what the critics contend. Could anyone clear this for me? Rest of the questions went with ease

interested!

I debated between A and C and I am still a bit confused after listening to JY's explanation. I get that there is a mistake of treating it as a flaw just bc there's an absence of evidence, but I ended up choosing C bc another premise at the end mentioned how parthenogenesis occurs among nonmammalian vertebrates, so I thought this was an alternate explanation.#help

Bc they disagreed so much I naturally assumed it'd be low cohesion... bc in real life high cohesion means high levels of uniformity, concurrence, etc. anyone thought the same?

I got rid of AC E bc Terry shouldn't be required if NONE of the issues are relevant but E is saying majority are relevant. DId anyone else got rid of AC E this way? #help (Added by Admin)

After listening to JY's explanation it makes more sense. I kept choosing AC D bc the reasoning in my head kept telling me 'ok, what k is saying is that since gov spent more tax money on highways before, it will even out.' Wondering if anyone interpreted this Q the same way!

#help

I chose E bc AC C said specifically proponents and it got me thinking huh but doctors are if anything against the herb usage...

I ended up choosing A mostly bc of 2 reasons. Debated between A and E even during BR, but I think AC E is a trap AC after all. BECAUSe the argument started out w/ OPA aka the proponents of electric car, it would only make sense of somewhat legitimate argument to tie back to what was mentioned to kick out the argument initially? Also we cannot conclusively RPOVE that there ill not be a net reduction in environmental degradation. Idk if this reasoning was right, but that's how I got to the correct answer.