- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
In the last example argument (Here is an argument that exemplifies the flaw in (E)), wouldn't assuming that people are exclusively self-interested because consent is impossible be confusing sufficiency and necessity? Because the first premise has 'exclusively self-interested' as the sufficient condition, while 'government by consent is impossible' is necessary—so how can government by concept being impossible imply that all people are exclusively self-interested? #help
I was wondering about the random question stem! I thought I missed something...
I agree, it's very confusing when JY repeatedly says it not worth thinking about the options. I get that it's a useful thought experiment but its very time confusing.
I get that, but it would be nice to use as another opportunity to practice since it's a real practice question
I also was confused about this! I know why the other answers are wrong, but this seems like a misrepresentation of the argument
This video really should be remade in the absence of logic games. For those of us who never had LG, and thus followed the new curriculum without it, this explanation is only partially coherent. We're left putting the pieces together rather than with a clear explanation. #feedback