User Avatar
j_w180
Joined
Jan 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
149
CAS GPA
4.15
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT131.S2.Q7
User Avatar
j_w180
2 days ago

Breaking down the stimulus:

It has been noted that attending a live musical performance is a richer experience than is listening to recorded music -> phenomenon presented

Some say that this is merely because we do not see the performers when we listen to recorded music -> some other ppls opinion about this

However, there must be some other reason -> Conclusion (says that "some says" is not enough)

why is it not enough? because there is the premise that there is relatively little difference between listening to someone read a story over the radio and listening to someone in the same room read a story.

Breaking down answer choice E:

It (Phenomenon) is

what the position that the columnist tries to undermine (some other ppls opnion)

is purported to explain.

1
User Avatar
j_w180
Sunday, May 3

@Jake. Thank you!

1
User Avatar
j_w180
Saturday, May 2

@Jake. Hi! Just a quick question, how does the "cancel score" work? Will the law schools know if I cancelled the score?

1
User Avatar
j_w180
Friday, May 1

Thank you for the post! As I was reading it, I found so many similarities. This April was also my first LSAT and I was very depressed about my score (150). It's been 6 months studying for this test and although I have always been a straight A student for my Bachelors and Masters (as you did), standardized testing was always my weakness. But I realized that if I am not going to give up, I should overcome these emotions and start studying again! I hope everything works out for both of us!

4
PrepTests ·
PT124.S2.Q14
User Avatar
j_w180
Wednesday, Apr 29

Read the answer choices too fast and was fixated on the conclusion of accepting the verdict of tradition:

Stimulus:

Accept the tradition that H is the author

Some tradition says H is the author and same equal force of evidence shows that H is not.

-- -- --

At first, trying to find the answer choices that goes along the line "if both are equally powerful and no evidence that overwhelms the other, then yield to the tradition. But, going through the AC, none of them were similar to my prediction:

A) Stimulus concluded to follow the tradition so it is wrong to suspend the judgement

C) One should believe what?

D) Never mentions anything nontraditional (if you think that connects to other evidences that are not traditional, it would be overthinking)

E) If two or more hypotheses conflict with it? There aren't two or more hypotheses given

So after finding areas that I don't like in each answer choice, I re-read B.

B points directly to the other evidence that is given in the stimulus, that if it is not overwhelming, we should not choose it.

1
User Avatar
j_w180
Wednesday, Apr 29

@julielamberth Thank you so much for your response! As you have mentioned, I think I should practice more on recognizing why the correct answers are correct and the wrong ones are wrong.

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S3.Q18
User Avatar
j_w180
Tuesday, Apr 28

It was hard for me to recognize the flaw for this question so went through process of elimination

C: companies won't be wasting their money if purchase equipment

P: survey of businesses that have purchased such equipment, respondents said equipment was well worth its cost

-- -- --

A) Wrongly states the premise - premise is about survey respondents saying that its worth the cost

B) Not confusing necessary and sufficient

C) Nope. Not about inadequate argument

E) Not confuses value vs. cost

Hence, left with D for the answer

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S3.Q9
User Avatar
j_w180
Tuesday, Apr 28

This took a long time for me to understand but here is how I got it:

P: Believe no effect on society's future -> helpless to change society

(contrapositive = not feel helpless -> effect on society's future)

Con: Improve society -> not belief future determined by historical factors (same as believing no effect on society's future)

New idea in conclusion = Improve society

How to connect the two?

Taking the contrapositive of the premise and connecting it with the conclusion:

P: Not feel helpless -> effect on society's future

Con: improve society -> Not believe ppl has no effect on society's future

So connection between not feel helpless and improve society

-- -- --

Ans. D) Improve society -> not accept any belief that makes feel helpless

1
User Avatar
j_w180
Tuesday, Apr 28

Since there are lots of international students who are using 7 Sage, I think it would be great to answer some questions related to international applicants. I have been trying to gather information about international applicants but not much information is provided:

  1. Are international applicants viewed the same as U.S. applicants? Some schools seems to prefer U.S. citizens more... Or is this just a myth?

  2. What could be some important tips pertaining only to international students?

  3. As an international applicants, are there more obstacles that we encounter? If so, how can we overcome them?

  4. (Not related to international applicants) Are job experience important for law school applications? I heard that gap year does not look good on law school application and I have bee applying for jobs but did not get any responses back.

Thank you!

4
User Avatar

Tuesday, Apr 28

j_w180

😖 Frustrated

154 untimed but 168 BR... What am I doing wrong?

Hi everyone,

I recently took an untimed practice test to focus purely on accuracy and scored a 154, which was frustrating. I had assumed timing was my main issue, but this result suggests that there are other problems.

However, during Blind Review, I scored a 168. This made me realize that I tend to overthink questions and often get stuck between two answer choices, which leads me to pick the wrong one under normal conditions.

When I revisit the questions I missed during Blind Review, I’m usually able to solve them correctly, which makes the gap even more confusing.

I’d really appreciate insight on a few things:

  • What might be causing this gap between my untimed score and Blind Review score?

  • How can I avoid getting stuck between two answer choices?

  • What strategies can help me become more decisive and close this performance gap?

Thanks in advance!

5
User Avatar
j_w180
Tuesday, Apr 28

@MailJabrayilov Hi! Thank you so much for your response! Can I message you with a few more questions? I truly appreciate your time!

2
PrepTests ·
PT140.S2.Q25
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

Con: Stars not more than a few million miles from earth

P: if farther away, move at tremendously great speed

-- -- --

NA question.

So since there are not so farther away, they are not moving in tremendously great speed -> answer choice D

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S2.Q21
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

1)

Most fiction books published -> literary agents OR directly from fiction writers (requested)

2)

Nonfiction books serious attention (published) -> Renowned figure OR requested manuscript

-- -- --

Did process of elimination for this one. Made sure that I could infer the answer from the diagram

A) we don't know if unrequested manuscripts given serious attention or not

B) There could be renowned writers for the book of fiction

C) received full attention would be work of non-fiction or renowned figure NOT fiction books

D) less likely to give careful consideration? What? we don't know anything about consideration

E) Hard to understand this answer choice but seems like it is related to the second diagram... not requested, then renowned figure?

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S2.Q9
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

Con: Falsely criticized for not being an environmentally responsible corporation

P: Current production methods pollute significantly less than our old methods did

P: there currently are no methods that do not produce any pollution.

-- -- --

Flaw I have identified: Based on what are they claiming that there are no other methods that don't produce any pollution? They are saying this only based on comparison between their new and old method.

A) Cannot be developed? Doesn't talk about this

B) Different causes have similar effects? Irrelevant

C) Does not generalize and what is class of criticisms?

D) It does not have to succeeded and they are not mentioning this

E) Correct. They are not considering the fact that there could be other methods which can produce less pollution than it does now.

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S2.Q7
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

Grain price double - avg. price of loaf of bread rise BUT grain-fed beef will come close to doubling

-- -- --

RRE question

beef and bread both use grain but why does beef price double and bread just rise between 10-15%?

While beef eat only grain, when making bread, there are other ingredients used so grain won't be used as much as beef. Hence answer choice C

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S2.Q6
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

Con: Most ppl who commit embezzlement or bribery will eventually be caught

P: ppl repeatedly commit crimes LIKE embezzlement or bribery w/o being caught become confident - each success, less likely to get caught.

P: More crimes a person commits, greater chance of being caught

-- -- --

Based on the two premise, we need an assumption to make the conclusion stand.

How will they be eventually be caught? Ppl who repeatedly do crimes become confident and less likely to be caught. Then this might be true for embezzlement and bribery as well (since premise 1 just gives embezzlement or bribery as an example)

So the answer will be A.

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S2.Q3
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

Con: Humorous TV ads are the ONLY effective ones

P: humorous -> attract ppl's attention + hold their attention long enough for message to be conveyed

P: for an ad to be effective, must convey its message

-- -- --

So there are no other ways that will make ad effective? Humorous ad is effective just because it combines the two premises?

Only humor can attract ppl's attention and have them captured for a message to be conveyed?

With these constant questions in my mind, I choose answer choice A.

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S1.Q22
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

C: Predatory pricing should be acceptable

P: mere threat of renewed competition will prevent the company from raising its prices to unreasonable levels

-- -- --

NA question so when negated, the argument will fall.

How can I make connection between the two to make the argument stand? My prediction was that if predatory pricing does not exist, company will increase prices to unreasonable level. Hence, if predatory pricing leads to prevention of unreasonable prices, the argument will win = answer choice C.

At first, I was tempted with answer choice B (idk to be honest) and thought that "oh since after the competitors go out of business, then a new competition will emerge and hence, won't be happening simultaneously". This was overthinking and out of scope.

Realized that I am doing a lot of overthinking as I am solving the questions and decided to eliminate answer choices that make me imagine stuff. Trying to play within the stimulus only.

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S1.Q20
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

Family generated more income (sold wool on international market) but failed to enjoy a commensurate increase in prosperity.

-- -- --

As soon as I read the stimulus, some of my guesses were that probably the government took a lot of tax from internationally sold wools or general expenses increased. None of my predictions appeared in the AC so got it wrong the first time (choose A but found out "end of 1800" is out of the question since our range is from 1840-1860)

When choosing the answer, I kept asking myself does this close the gap? which made me choose C. If wool is just a small part of income, and other components decreased, then they won't be able to make a enjoy the money they earned because it doesn't make a big difference.

1
PrepTests ·
PT140.S1.Q19
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

Intentionally misrepresent another person's beliefs --> one's purpose is to act in the interest of that other person

-- -- --

Totally misread the question as "conforms" to the principle and chose B but during BR, re-read the question and choose A.

It is correct that Ann misrepresents Bruce's beliefs but does so to make him look ridiculous which is not acting in interest of that other person.

2
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 27

Hi! I think I replied to your previous post and it is impressive that you are constantly improving! I was wondering if you have any tips on RC? Some of the passages are really hard and I am struggling to get understand them:( How do you go about hard passages? Also, do you think doing untimed is more important than doing a timed section? How do you balance practicing both timed and untimed? Thank you once again for your response!

2
User Avatar
j_w180
Thursday, Apr 23

Congratulations! I hope to reach a 170+ too this June test! Do you have any tips for time management in RC? I am taking too long to read the passages and keep overthinking about the questions by reading them more than 2 times. Thank you in advance for your response!

3
User Avatar
j_w180
Monday, Apr 20

@MailJabrayilov Thank you so much for your advice! I'll try doing that! I wish you all the best with your LSAT journey and law school applications!

1
User Avatar
j_w180
Sunday, Apr 19

Congrats! Do you have any tips on time management for the sections? I am struggling a lot on time management and overthinking on the questions:(

2
User Avatar
j_w180
Wednesday, Apr 8

Hi! I am on the same boat as you are!

For the time section, I get between -9 to -6 but during the BR, I get -3.

Something that I am trying is flagging questions that I could not understand on the first read and come back to it later. This has actually helped me save much more time. Also, when I see conditionals and I know that I have to diagram, I tend to flag them and come back to it later.

With second-guessing, I am an overthinker and I have been struggling with this for a few months. These days, I stopped trying to understand the wrong answers. When I have a prediction in my mind, I tend to just go with it and never think about that question.

I hope this helps! All the best with your LSAT journey!

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?